I'm very sorry

[mosch]

You wrote:
[ QUOTE ]
However, isn't it likely that the reason Paul was banned was a result of this violation of expected privacy?

[/ QUOTE ]

Mason's email says:
[ QUOTE ]
Paul, we are considering granting your wish of never allowing you to post here again. You need to appologize, first to us privately, and then to the forum.

[/ QUOTE ]

Given the available evidence, it is very likely that Mason banned Paul because Mason said he was going to ban Paul. Your explanation, while slightly less petty, is certainly not "likely".

Ed Miller then summarized the situation thusly:
[ QUOTE ]
Paulp compared the owner of the website to a Nazi. The owner banned him.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is technically true, but leads the reader to false conclusions. Paulp had been told that he would be banned long before comparisons to nazis were involved.

As such, I stand by my assertion that willfully or otherwise, you guys are being dishonest with us. If you don't like the accusation, I suggest you stop pretending that all of 2+2s actions were good ones.