#1
|
|||
|
|||
$50 NL - turned 2 pairs but with a three to flush
The villain is a rather tight player who has folded to almost all my preflop raises and that's all I know about him. What you guys think about this hand on each street and what would you do in such situation.
Jordy is at seat 1 with 55.45 Zoli2 is at seat 2 with 36.80 LaCoste* is at seat 3 with 67.57 hunter65 is at seat 4 with 19.37 CKIRBYGO is at seat 5 with 57.85 hunter65 posts the large blind 0.50 LaCoste* posts the small blind 0.25 LaCoste*: K [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], J [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] hunter65: --, -- CKIRBYGO: --, -- Jordy: --, -- Zoli2: --, -- Pre-flop: CKIRBYGO: Call 0.50 Jordy: Call 0.50 Zoli2: Fold LaCoste*: Call 0.50 hunter65: Raise 1.00 CKIRBYGO: Call 1.00 Jordy: Call 1.00 LaCoste*: Call 1.00 Flop (Board: 10 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 7 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], K [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]): LaCoste*: Bet 3.00 hunter65: Call 3.00 CKIRBYGO: Fold Jordy: Fold Turn (Board: 10 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 7 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], K [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], J [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]): LaCoste*: Check hunter65: Bet 5.00 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL - turned 2 pairs but with a three to flush
Bet/fold turn should be your standard line here. See HPFAP's section on play when the flush card hits.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL - turned 2 pairs but with a three to flush
May I ask what HPFAP stands for?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL - turned 2 pairs but with a three to flush
Hold'em Poker for Advanced Players. It's a book on limit, but a lot of the concepts can be applied to NL as well.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL - turned 2 pairs but with a three to flush
OOP against a tight player (which means he's less likely to bluff a flush). Good turn check since you're OOP. I'd check-call the turn and non-heart river.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL - turned 2 pairs but with a three to flush
[ QUOTE ]
Good turn check since you're OOP. [/ QUOTE ] What if Villain has KQ with the Q of hearts or something similar? I think the problem with checking this board is that it gives any heart or pair + gutshot type hand infinite odds to outdraw you... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL - turned 2 pairs but with a three to flush
Yeah that certainly sucks. If I were last to act, I'd bet the hell out of this turn. But being OOP I'll be looking to keep the pot as small as possible.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL - turned 2 pairs but with a three to flush
I don't think checking and calling a bet keeps the pot any smaller than betting 3/4ths and then folding if raised.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL - turned 2 pairs but with a three to flush
Are you taking this line because the villain is tight? Or is this how you play it generally?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL - turned 2 pairs but with a three to flush
Just wondering because if you're going to bet 3/4 pot and fold to a raise, why not check-call up to a 3/4 pot bet and get to see the river which may fill up your boat... not only that you may be ahead anyway. I am generally not trying to win big pots OOP.
|
|
|