Please don't be this guy

[MicroBob]

I agree completely.

I think the phrase "all it takes is a floor confident enough to" is something that could apply to A LOT of thread in here.

The guy who stank so bad that players left the room (but the floor never dealt with him).
The guyat the bike who was yelling profanities and racist remarks whom the floor still wouldn't kick out.
The guy who is so distracted that he is slowing down the game.


etc etc etc.


If you stink horribly, or yell profanity, or simply slow down the game, then freaking DEAL with these guys so that the playing experience can be pleasureable for everyone.


I also agree that there it is not necessary to ban ALL I-pods (or other headphones).
If you can play with the IPod then good for you.
If you can't and keep holding things up then simply don't allow him to listen to music if he wants to continue playing there.


Simply asking him to "please pay attention" obviously wasn't doing the trick.
That means it's time to take the NEXT step.
But it seems that MANY rooms refuse to do that...and will just continue to take the same step over and over regardless of the fact that it's completely ineffective.

[juanez]

[ QUOTE ]
The guy who stank so bad that players left the room (but the floor never dealt with him).


[/ QUOTE ]
FWIW, if you read the tread, the other floor person and I were deciding who whould be the one to toss his stinky butt, but left on his own first - he was there about 15 mintues or so.

If someone farts once, do you expect the floor to 86 him? Repeatedly fogging the pace, yes.

[MicroBob]

I know that you guys were talking about tossing him...but never actually did.

I don't recall seeing that he was only there for 15 minutes (I either missed that part...or it wasn't there). For some reason I was thinking it was longer (like an hour or so) but that was probably just my imagination.


Actually....the whole idea of "Fart and you're gone!!" might not be such a bad idea!!

[Photoc]

[ QUOTE ]
I also agree that there it is not necessary to ban ALL I-pods (or other headphones).
If you can play with the IPod then good for you.
If you can't and keep holding things up then simply don't allow him to listen to music if he wants to continue playing there.


[/ QUOTE ]

Then you'll have some internet trained moron yelling discrimination because he can't use the Ipod when someone else can. Either the same rule goes for everyone, or no one. None of the selective enforcement crap I keep seeing lately.

[Randy_Refeld]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I also agree that there it is not necessary to ban ALL I-pods (or other headphones).
If you can play with the IPod then good for you.
If you can't and keep holding things up then simply don't allow him to listen to music if he wants to continue playing there.


[/ QUOTE ]

Then you'll have some internet trained moron yelling discrimination because he can't use the Ipod when someone else can. Either the same rule goes for everyone, or no one. None of the selective enforcement crap I keep seeing lately.

[/ QUOTE ]



Well since we have this rule dealing with the actual play of the game.

[ QUOTE ]
8. The same action may have a different meaning, depending on who does it, so the possible intent of an offender will be taken into consideration. Some factors here are the person’s amount of poker experience and past record.

[/ QUOTE ]

I thikn it woudl naturally follow that you only tell offenders to put away the IPOD. The rule isn't that some people can have it and some can't; the rule is NOBODY will delay the game.

[Photoc]

This is very good rule to have. I would suport this 100%.

Although I would probably bring a portable DVD player with me [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[juanez]

[ QUOTE ]
I thikn it woudl naturally follow that you only tell offenders to put away the IPOD. The rule isn't that some people can have it and some can't; the rule is NOBODY will delay the game.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just being devils advocate here, but do feel the same way about cell phones? If someone is keeping up with the action but talking away for 15 minutes on a cell, is that worthy of a talking to by the floor? It's not delaying the game at all, just annoying the players who have to listen to to it.

Here we have a "no cell phone use at the table" rule (wether you're in the current hand or not), so it's not an issue that the floor has to deal with at all which is nice.

[Photoc]

Our rule is that we allow phones but if you slow down the game, you "may" lose your hand. Any communication on the phone about your hand will kill it imediately. I've seen that happen many times at the table.

Lots of rooms in Vegas are close to sports books and phone useage isn't allowed near a sports book. So that eliminates a lot of it.

[Randy_Refeld]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I thikn it woudl naturally follow that you only tell offenders to put away the IPOD. The rule isn't that some people can have it and some can't; the rule is NOBODY will delay the game.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just being devils advocate here, but do feel the same way about cell phones? If someone is keeping up with the action but talking away for 15 minutes on a cell, is that worthy of a talking to by the floor? It's not delaying the game at all, just annoying the players who have to listen to to it.

Here we have a "no cell phone use at the table" rule (wether you're in the current hand or not), so it's not an issue that the floor has to deal with at all which is nice.

[/ QUOTE ]

Cell phones are in a different catagory becasue they can be distracting to the other players. I see nothign wrong with someoen calling their voice mial, text messaging etc at the table, but if they are going to talk on the phone they should step away from the table as a courtesy to the other players.

[Miah]

The only thing that worries me about text messaging is that ir allows for players to covertly communicate with each other.