|
|
|
|
#1
10-18-2005, 07:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What a Lot of Rakeback Affiliates Look Like To Me
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] we need to form a union. We would look after our interests and not profit from other player's rake. We should seriously consider doing this. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] It's not incentive compatible so it wouldn't work. 
|
|
#2
10-19-2005, 06:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What a Lot of Rakeback Affiliates Look Like To Me
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] we need to form a union. We would look after our interests and not profit from other player's rake. We should seriously consider doing this. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] It's not incentive compatible so it wouldn't work. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, basically we can't shut ourselves down, because whoever stays behind on a site is going to have AWESOME games... prisoners dilema, and everyone stays and gets shafted equally. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] However, one thing that was suggested, when party raised the rake on 6-max games, was that everyone could sit at a 6-max table and just not play, so that the games were 5-max at the lower rake. This might have given party a clear idea of what was involved in [censored] over their players. I said I'd do it, no one supported it. --Dave.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
