![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know why I haven't mentioned this previously. But the fact is that no one, religious or not, can intelligently discuss God or religion without becoming familiar with all of the known aspects of the double slit experiment. So do it now.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The double slit experament is completely irrelevent to discussing CHRISTIANITY intelligently. In what way is it relevant to discussing other religions? And why?
Did you mean to say that no one can disprove the existense of God without a complete knowledge of all aspects of the double slit experiment? And again, why? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
this is straightforwardly false, but then again, you knew that.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll grant that you can take out the word "religion" from my original post.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
this is straightforwardly false, but then again, you knew that. [/ QUOTE ] I have too few posts to begin contradicting myself (by berating other posters), but was this an attempt at some kind of point? And if so what was it? Who was this even directed at, Sklansky or myself? Sorry If I come off as an ass but whatthewhodawhatee? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] this is straightforwardly false, but then again, you knew that. [/ QUOTE ] I have too few posts to begin contradicting myself (by berating other posters), but was this an attempt at some kind of point? And if so what was it? Who was this even directed at, Sklansky or myself? Sorry If I come off as an ass but whatthewhodawhatee? [/ QUOTE ] If you look at the “Re:” right above the body of the post (the heading, I guess we can call it) the screen name after the "Re" shows who it replies to. In this case, snowden719 is replying to Sklansky. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
like this?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Exactly. But, I forgot to mention, you can only see the "Re:" while viewing posts in flat mode. Do you SEE why? LOL.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And all this time!!!...............
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Double-slit experiments with light show that light behaves like a wave, even though it also consists of particles. In fact, even a single particle behaves like a wave. So we have a mysterious duality where a photon appears to be in more than one place at the same time.
Is it this duality in nature that is supposed to inform our discussion, or what? |
![]() |
|
|