#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: for those playing 400 and above
My work laptop does 1600 x 1200. It's a pretty big screen, so although small it isn't annoying. Much better then overlap at a different resolution IMO.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: for those playing 400 and above
Congratulations. Mine doesn't do high res and it is small.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: for those playing 400 and above
lol, datamine 5/10 NL for awhile and you'll find 25% of the players are playing 4 tables.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: for those playing 400 and above
[ QUOTE ]
lol, datamine 5/10 NL for awhile and you'll find 25% of the players are playing 4 tables. [/ QUOTE ] or you have some ridiculous players doing 3 HU matches + 4 tables + MTTs on multiple sites at the same time |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: for those playing 400 and above
are these all sharks?
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: for those playing 400 and above
Yes.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: for those playing 400 and above
amoeba, i do the same with pt. only for post game analysis. in the heat of battle i misintrepret way too much.
plus my notes are better then raw numbersi HOPE |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: for those playing 400 and above
[ QUOTE ]
are these all sharks? [/ QUOTE ] of course. i think the guy i was thinking about was xxxJOKERxxx or something like that, placed like 5th in WCOOP main event while simultaneously playing 2 HU 10/20 ring games and 2+ 10/20 6-max games |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: for those playing 400 and above
[ QUOTE ]
amoeba, i do the same with pt. only for post game analysis. in the heat of battle i misintrepret way too much. plus my notes are better then raw numbersi HOPE [/ QUOTE ] cool. hehe, I miss those days when we would argue about raising KQs out of the blinds. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: for those playing 400 and above
[ QUOTE ]
hehe, I miss those days when we would argue about raising KQs out of the blinds. [/ QUOTE ] heh [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] I thought it was just completing from the blinds with KQs? Someone, I'd bet alot of money it was sourbeaver, wanted to fold this from sb. |
|
|