|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KK - was this weak?
In 1.5 hrs I had seen her bet 1 time with less than top pair on the flop. That time it was four to the nut flush. And if that's the case here, I'm in a lot of trouble. But I am just getting my legs under me so, it probably was weak.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KK - was this weak?
[ QUOTE ]
In 1.5 hrs I had seen her bet 1 time with less than top pair on the flop. That time it was four to the nut flush. And if that's the case here, I'm in a lot of trouble. But I am just getting my legs under me so, it probably was weak. [/ QUOTE ] What's the use of gathering reads if we're afraid to use them b/c it's "weak". When a loose passive player (defined by PT stats alone) donks out to the PFR on an ace high flop it means he has an ace or better probably like 90% of the time. And you have a stronger read on top of that. Maybe maybe he has a flush draw here. But a vast majority of the time he has an ace. So a fold is ok. If you're going to continue I think you have to raise the flop. FWIW, though, I think calling a 3-bet or a turn donkbet is really really bad. EDIT: didn't notice there were two players left to act. I think this makes it more correct to fold. |
|
|