|
|
|
|
#1
09-01-2005, 03:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Good squeeze or blatant spewery?
[ QUOTE ]
I'd rather make this play with junk. 44 is a great implied odds hand in this position on the BN with tons of callers in a raised pot. [/ QUOTE ] You are 100% right. Thinking back I may have my hand wrong. may have had T8s or some other thing I would limp on the button after multiple limpers. Bleh I should have waited til I had the HH. Sounds like I'm backpedaling, but whatever. Anyway now that I'm to the flop, I have to push when he checks to me, right? 
|
|
#2
09-01-2005, 03:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Good squeeze or blatant spewery?
Yes. Or at least bet. I'm forgetting the stack size. But definitely push if it's not an overbet. Although sometimes I find that 100 from a 120-130 stack has more fold equity than a push. I find that single chips have a lot of FE. 25s have a lot, but 100s have a ton. Weird, but I'm fairly sure correct, observation.
|
|
#3
09-01-2005, 03:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Good squeeze or blatant spewery?
[ QUOTE ]
Although sometimes I find that 100 from a 120-130 stack has more fold equity than a push. I find that single chips have a lot of FE. 25s have a lot, but 100s have a ton. Weird, but I'm fairly sure correct, observation. [/ QUOTE ] Interesting. Thanks for the replies and sorry for screwed up the OP. Have to look when i get home, I'm really hoping I didn't do this with 44.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
