#1
|
|||
|
|||
QQ call all-in at Level 1?
PP $11
Seat 3 is the button Total number of players : 10 Seat 10: Eyedol ( $770 ) Seat 3: uclabruinz ( $760 ) Seat 1: kr36david ( $395 ) Seat 4: moomoo18_34 ( $810 ) Seat 8: ukykeeper200 ( $915 ) Seat 5: chili588 ( $315 ) Seat 2: TallThinMan ( $975 ) Seat 7: riksgirl ( $355 ) Seat 9: xxKongKingxx ( $1465 ) Seat 6: wilmeyer ( $1240 ) Blinds(10/15) Dealt to uclabruinz [ Qh Qd ] wilmeyer raises [30]. 5 folds. TallThinMan calls [30]. uclabruinz raises [150]. 2 folds. wilmeyer is all-In [1210] TallThinMan folds. uclabruinz ??? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ call all-in at Level 1?
up to you.
folding and calling are both good at the 11s. I will normally fold but may call if I am tilting and not be concerned that it is a huge leak. The problem with calling is that many of the times he doesn't have AA or KK, he will have AK and then you are still only a ~55% favorite. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ call all-in at Level 1?
[ QUOTE ]
up to you. folding and calling are both good at the 11s. I will normally fold but may call if I am tilting and not be concerned that it is a huge leak. The problem with calling is that many of the times he doesn't have AA or KK, he will have AK and then you are still only a ~55% favorite. [/ QUOTE ] At the 11s? I'd say a very tight range to put him on is TT+, AQ+, which you're 55/45 against. Given that there's money in the pot, that many players won't do this with hands that want calls, and that he could be on a much wider range, I think this is a call. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ call all-in at Level 1?
[ QUOTE ]
up to you. folding and calling are both good at the 11s. I will normally fold but may call if I am tilting and not be concerned that it is a huge leak. The problem with calling is that many of the times he doesn't have AA or KK, he will have AK and then you are still only a ~55% favorite. [/ QUOTE ] After thinking about it, I think you mostly have to lay this down even at the $11s. An UTG mini-raise to a re-raise all-in just smells too much like AA. Sure, could just be a fishy move, but doesn't seem like it. I have been feeling tilty for about a week, so I called it, and of course he showed AA, which held up. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ call all-in at Level 1?
I probably call figuring he has AK, AQ, or JJ or even TT...minraise utg does not scream AA or KK to me.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ call all-in at Level 1?
How did the villian win his ~400 extra chips? If he has been showing a lot of loose aggressiveness, which I think could be the case here, you might want to call. If he is a LAG there's a strong chance he holds AQ or worse, and doubling up at this stage is valuable.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ call all-in at Level 1?
Wish you hadn't said the results so quickly. Now I wanna say "Well, considering that he miniraised." I still think given no reads this is a call.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ call all-in at Level 1?
[ QUOTE ]
Wish you hadn't said the results so quickly. Now I wanna say "Well, considering that he miniraised." I still think given no reads this is a call. [/ QUOTE ] My bad. I think the mini-raise is used quite a bit by AA holdings at the $11s, hoping that at least one guy raises you giving you the opportunity to push. I used to do it myself. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ call all-in at Level 1?
i go broke here EVERYTIME with QQ up to the $33's against unknown and $55's against known.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ call all-in at Level 1?
[ QUOTE ]
i go broke here EVERYTIME with QQ up to the $33's against unknown and $55's against known. [/ QUOTE ] Easily. |
|
|