$55 - uneasy ITM spot with AT

bluefeet · #1 08-27-2005, 01:03 AM

yeah, some pretty muddled rambling there. i don't think your point MB was my intent.

i propose push.

he mentioned "not being desperate" (or something to that effect) regarding the not pushing arguement. i was trying to make the point that with a "standard" raise and a whiff, he was essentially looking at laying the hand down (minus a few hundred chips). with the blinds raking through after this one, he's basically pushing with less next orbit. i personally do not like raising. i could fold easier than raising. but i push [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

Isura · #2 08-27-2005, 01:20 AM

[ QUOTE ]
i personally do not like raising. i could fold easier than raising. but i push

[/ QUOTE ]

I really think that folding is much worse than limping.

Chaostracize · #3 08-27-2005, 01:32 AM

Limping is worse than cutting off your feet like in the movie Saw which is a horrible movie but not as horrible as limping.

Isura · #4 08-27-2005, 01:48 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Limping is worse than cutting off your feet like in the movie Saw which is a horrible movie but not as horrible as limping.

[/ QUOTE ]

Meh. What's wrong with playing a fairly strong hand for 1/13 of our stack IN POSITION in a 3-handed poker game? I'm not saying limping is the best, but it's certainly better than folding.