|
|
|
|
#1
07-09-2005, 03:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Mouth at again
no, your idea is even worse than having the pathetic rule in the first place
has anyone even been able to come up with an decent argument for introducing it? anyway, hopefully it keeps mike out of trouble and he goes on to win the damn thing, it'd shut this forum up for a while 
|
|
#2
07-09-2005, 03:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Mouth at again
If there is going to be a rule with a penatly then it should have more teeth and get harsher for repeat offensives. I think maybe a warning should be introduced but Mike just kept pushing it and he should be bounced if he knew the penalty was going to get worse and a chance of him getting thrown out he would never have pushed it that far.
RZ
|
|
#4
07-09-2005, 03:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Mouth at again
[ QUOTE ]
In the TDA rules, the penalties go 10, 20, 30, 40, DQ. Kevin... [/ QUOTE ] So if Mike drops one more F-bomb the rest of the way he's DQ'ed??? Would make for some great TV if The Mouth gets heads-up for the title, takes down an all in which leaves his poor opponent with hardly a BB left and he lets out a "Fvcking-A!!"
|
|
#5
07-09-2005, 04:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Mouth at again
[ QUOTE ]
In the TDA rules, the penalties go 10, 20, 30, 40, DQ. Kevin... [/ QUOTE ] So should Mike being setting out 1 hour and 40 minutes not just 40? I know he got all of them at the same time but he shouldn't be able to serve them currently. Finish the first 10 minute, then serve 20 more and so on, looks like they are just making him do the 40 and covering the others. But maybe Cardplayer got it wrong and the penalty wasn't rounded up the director said thats 10, thats 20, thats 30 and thats 40 maybe he wasn't giving the total time but the time for each penalty. RZ
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
