#1
|
|||
|
|||
Baseball Prosectus
I recieve the basic (free) newsletter and for the most part enjoy what i read. on the wholei dont enjoy much of what is written in the free press (espn/cnn etc) as it just seems like the basic, tell the masses what they want to hear nonsense. is the premium subscription worth the $40 a year? any good/bad reviews (jack you around?) most importantly, nate can you get me a discount if i sign up? [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Baseball Prosectus
Is this like the thing Biff had in Back to the Future II?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Baseball Prosectus
[ QUOTE ]
I recieve the basic (free) newsletter and for the most part enjoy what i read. on the wholei dont enjoy much of what is written in the free press (espn/cnn etc) as it just seems like the basic, tell the masses what they want to hear nonsense. is the premium subscription worth the $40 a year? any good/bad reviews (jack you around?) most importantly, nate can you get me a discount if i sign up? [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] How about a group rate??? [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Baseball Prosectus
no review, but all the baseball readers on the board should thank pshreck for sending me an new avatar. i had mussina up as a temporary thing but got too lazy to change it...
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Baseball Prosectus
I think it's worth $40 per year, just for Will Carroll's injury info alone. Nate's stuff is OK too. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Baseball Prosectus
thank god you changed it... was very confused last nite when i thought dead was making posts that didn't make me want to strangle him with his own intestines
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Baseball Prosectus
[ QUOTE ]
Is this like the thing Biff had in Back to the Future II? [/ QUOTE ] That was a Sports Almanac, good try though. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Baseball Prosectus
sublime,
I don't subscribe to it, but I use their stats a ton. I've read plenty of mixed reviews about their premium content, which is why I don't subscribe. I've never actually read a ton of their stuff except for Nate's. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Baseball Prosectus
For what it's worth, I'm very happy with my subscription.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Baseball Prosectus
Speaking of BP stuff - whatever happened to the McCracken theory on balls in play? I thought a year or so ago, someone was going to present data to contradict QM's theory, but I never heard what became of it - and I haven't followed baseball as much this year.
|
|
|