![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not to jump on the beat-down bandwagon, but a limp-in with A9s here is marginal at best, but, then again, this IS a Stars tourney, and I'm pretty sure you have a handle on NL in general, and could get away from an ace flop if you needed to. Still though, what are you calling for then, other than the flush? Eh, you know all this.
Also, yeah, seen WAY worse play of AA, but come around more often. We need more Klingons in STT forum. Oh, and Brady/Manning pretty obviously gonna be a wash, with both getting in immediately when eligible. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
a limp-in with A9s here is marginal at best
No argument. I fold this at later levels, or if the table is aggressive. This one was not. what are you calling for then, other than the flush? When it's 60 back to me, I'm getting 8:1 immediate with a reasonable expectation that the one player left behind me will call closing the action (that he didn't is irrelevant). When the button did his reraise thing, I thought 'now I'm down a rathole against AA' and would have folded had the blinds folded. Against AA in the multiway pot, I'm about a 9:1 dog, so I a) make that up when I hit, or b) have good enough odds at 8:1 against his range of hands which I believed at the time to be AA 90% of the time. I call there for the same reason I call a small all-in from the BB without looking at my cards at a B&M tourney. I'm calling for that 10% hand. Let's say I flop a draw. Do you think a guy who played preflop like he did would deny me odds on the flop? We obviously know he didn't from the way he played, but I contend that's reasonable expectation. Reason 2: I've invested 12 minutes in this tourney. I know I'd rather gamble a bit now to build a stack and risk going bust than to play too tight and find myself with 10BB after 45 minutes. Time is money. Speculative play? Yes. Did I get lucky? Yes. When the odds are right, there's nothing wrong with playing to get lucky. That's the lesson the "poker's not gambling" geeks will never understand. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Speculative play? Yes. Did I get lucky? Yes. When the odds are right, there's nothing wrong with playing to get lucky. That's the lesson the "poker's not gambling" geeks will never understand. [/ QUOTE ] If poker geeks are about anything other than gambling when the odds are good, I haven't found it yet, so I don't really understand what this paragraph is supposed to mean. Is your mom shacking up with a nerd or something? You seem awfully hostile. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is your mom shacking up with a nerd or something? You seem awfully hostile.
My mom is 82. If she's shacking up with anyone, more power to her. That doesn't make you any less of a c*ck s*cking moron for typing that sentence. I'm probably more than twice your age, but I'll be happy to crush your skull if I ever meet you in person. That is, unless you apologize. |
![]() |
|
|