|
|
|
|
#2
05-12-2005, 12:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two hands
[ QUOTE ]
QJ and [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] about the flop raise in the 2nd hand. What exactly is this trying to accomplish? Brad [/ QUOTE ] You put hero on the nuts, eh? 
|
|
#3
05-12-2005, 12:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Two hands
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] QJ and [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] about the flop raise in the 2nd hand. What exactly is this trying to accomplish? Brad [/ QUOTE ] You put hero on the nuts, eh? [/ QUOTE ] Well either that or he called on the flop with a gutshot or he totally misplayed his hand (this hand was misplayed regardless). No way something like T9 should raise this river. Any hand that is good enough to raise is good enough to cap in this spot (I didn't even see that the river wasn't capped the 1st time). Brad
|
|
#4
05-12-2005, 12:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Two hands
I put on 86 in first hand, and peeled one off for the flop to chase the gutshot with implied odds. This is the only hand that I could imagine would call/3bet the turn, and raise the river but not cap.
|
|
#5
05-12-2005, 12:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Two hands
[ QUOTE ]
I put on 86 in first hand, and peeled one off for the flop to chase the gutshot with implied odds. This is the only hand that I could imagine would call/3bet the turn, and raise the river but not cap. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah 86 and QJ are essentially the same hand in this spot. When the villian doesn't cap the turn, we can rule out QJ so we should be capping any river with both QJ/86. So no matter what hand he has, he played it wrong on 5th street.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
