who are the best 5/10 6max players? - Page 3

bobbyi · #21 05-09-2005, 04:05 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
there is actually a great reason NOT to discuss very bad players in a public forum. do you really want your juicy fish to be on everyone else's buddy list too?

[/ QUOTE ]

How does this disagree with what I said?

[/ QUOTE ]
I know that this is the internet and all, but that still doesn't require people to disagree with each other 100% of the timne.

highlife · #22 05-09-2005, 04:12 PM

I would look closely at this players hands:
1 Lizetta | 2789 | 35.6 | 7.1381 | 26.9989 | 14.9516 | 57.377

And stay far far away from these players hands:
9 iprieto | 658 | 8.5 | 18.2815 | 48.3283 | 1.0638 | 60.9929
7 HuggieMac | 571 | 7.35 | 23.4124 | 46.5849 | 10.8581 | 60.9091

you are right though, the relevance of this list is pretty low.... [img]/images/graemlins/ooo.gif[/img]

Scotch78 · #23 05-09-2005, 04:15 PM

Looking at my last full datamine, filtered for at least 1,000 hands and TAGish stats that weren't running insanely hot . . .

PokerArt82, A1exSem, Acolytez, Quetzalco, LASTYKRO, bruinbruin, kozlina, URINATE, Theryx, stoey_2, and Omon_Ra

Scott

ghettorat · #24 05-09-2005, 04:20 PM

Not all of these are good players, just running very good right now.

spamuell · #25 05-09-2005, 04:22 PM

chowngaitan

If this is a 2+2er, I'd really like to know who you are.

donger · #26 05-09-2005, 04:27 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I would look closely at this players hands:
1 Lizetta | 2789 | 35.6 | 7.1381 | 26.9989 | 14.9516 | 57.377

And stay far far away from these players hands:
9 iprieto | 658 | 8.5 | 18.2815 | 48.3283 | 1.0638 | 60.9929
7 HuggieMac | 571 | 7.35 | 23.4124 | 46.5849 | 10.8581 | 60.9091

you are right though, the relevance of this list is pretty low.... [img]/images/graemlins/ooo.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Interstingly, his stats come up in my autorate as TA-N. His aggression factor numbers: (F/T/R/tot) 1.44/1.73/1.74/1.58.

I'm on the opposite end of the spectrum; I've been getting killed, and I've been trying to get my AF total numbers down rabid (3.4) to aggressive (2.5ish).

Could a more passive approach be optimal at this limit? Or is he giving something by playing this style?

___1___ · #27 05-09-2005, 04:28 PM

[ QUOTE ]
chowngaitan

If this is a 2+2er, I'd really like to know who you are.

[/ QUOTE ]

FWIW, I thought he was a well above average 10/20 player (6 months back).

___1___

___1___ · #28 05-09-2005, 04:30 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Could a more passive approach be optimal at this limit?

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not a sin to press "call".

___1___

7ontheline · #29 05-09-2005, 04:38 PM

The relevance of these lists seems pretty minimal. If you're just being results oriented, anyone on a hot streak is going to show up here. Plenty of good players could be in a downswing during this time. More useful I suppose would be examining the stats/hands of players you saw in action that struck you as good. Even that is probably biased by results though.

donger · #30 05-09-2005, 04:40 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Could a more passive approach be optimal at this limit?

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not a sin to press "call".

___1___

[/ QUOTE ]

Coming from an small stakes full ring background, it sure feels like one. I think that's my number one problem at 6max so far; identifying calling situations on the flop and turn (ones that don't involve being raised on the previous round)