Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Home Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: $2/$4. $600 max buy in. Which line do you prefer?
2 fish 5 OKs 2 sharks + you 3 5.88%
2 fish 2 OKs 5 sharks + you 0 0%
5 fish 2 OKs 2 Shark + you 13 25.49%
3 fish 3 OKs 3 sharks + you 5 9.80%
9 sharks + you 0 0%
9 fish + you 30 58.82%
Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-01-2005, 09:41 AM
toots toots is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bedford, NH
Posts: 193
Default Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips

Q:

I don't know the terms on these MBT Paul-Son special orders, but are we talking about the same inlay for all denominations (excepting the denomination amount), or will there be different designs for each denomination?

Not that it'd change my order, but I'm just curious.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-01-2005, 09:45 AM
jojobinks jojobinks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 770
Default Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips

[ QUOTE ]
Q:

I don't know the terms on these MBT Paul-Son special orders, but are we talking about the same inlay for all denominations (excepting the denomination amount), or will there be different designs for each denomination?

Not that it'd change my order, but I'm just curious.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
There will be 7 chips. 25¢ through $1000. Standard colors, unless I can get Trademark to let me change a couple of them. Each chip will have a different inlay shape , all of which I have determined already.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-01-2005, 09:49 AM
Slow Play Ray Slow Play Ray is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Beantown
Posts: 527
Default Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips

He meant the inlay design, not the shape. I think it is a safe assumption they will all be the same aside from the denominations. Maybe a variety in background color though?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-01-2005, 02:38 PM
morglum_s morglum_s is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 39
Default Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips

I agree with Toots on this! I'd like to see the theme without refrence to a ficticious "club" or casino....

-m
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-01-2005, 11:40 AM
PhilTheThrill14 PhilTheThrill14 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 31
Default Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips

#2 is sweet. I'm in for 1,000 to 1,200. Can't wait to see the other
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-01-2005, 11:57 AM
rickw rickw is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 45
Default Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips

Sounds like #2 is the winner so far. What does everyone think about the watermark? Although it's a nice idea, I'm torn -- is it too much detail for such a small area? The rest of the design is so simple, does it end up creating clutter?

I'd be curious to see what #2 looks like w/o the watermark.

Also, I agree with the "common element" / keep it simple theme mentioned above.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-01-2005, 12:20 PM
PhilTheThrill14 PhilTheThrill14 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 31
Default Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips

I like the watermark alot - I think it should be the only "item" that changes from chip to chip. For example - have the .25 chip have the Ankh as a watermark, have the $1 have a different symbol\image. Maybe even have them use the same symbols used on the chipcos, but in a much more subtle way (the watermark). Any thoughts? Shall I be quite and just get my money ready?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-01-2005, 12:24 PM
MeridianFC MeridianFC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 52
Default Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips

It was a tough choice between #1 & #2, but #2 had a bit more of a classic look, which is my preference. The other Egyptians have a very modern look and they're on ChipCOs which are a more modern chip, so having a classic look for a classic clay chip seems to make sense.

BTW I didn't think any of the chip makers would let you use the non round shapes for inserts.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-01-2005, 12:52 PM
Philwannab Philwannab is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2
Default Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips

I passed last time on the Chipco set but loved the design. I am a classic clay kind of guy. So I am in on these for a bunch. I voted for #2 along with everyone else. Keep up the good work boys!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-01-2005, 12:37 PM
Cassius Cassius is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 21
Default Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips

As a aesthetics type thing, I would see what it would look like (on number 2) to ditch the sky over the pyramids, just have a clean line - I think it'll make the chip more centered as it seems to feel a bit top-heavy, if you will. Slick though.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.