![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] QJo is much better. people *greatly* overvalue the "makes more straights" feature of JT. i'll take "makes a stronger TP with a stronger kicker" every time. JTo is unplayable pre MP3. QJo is about the same, but it can raise a loose limper whereas JTo cannot. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. It is funny in the low limits how many LAGs play JTo from any position every time. It must be a long term loser. [/ QUOTE ] Well look at the Jones book (WLLH 2nd edition). He actually said that he found JTo to be STRONGER than he had previously thought. If I remember correctly he recommends to play it for one bet from any position. The thing I found interesting when comparing 2+2 to Jones, is that one side found JTo to be weaker than previously thought and the other found it to be stronger. I went with 2+2 [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] |
|
|