|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which cover do you prefer? | |||
| Original |
   
|
15 | 13.16% |
| Nagoo81's version |
  
|
57 | 50.00% |
| hukilai's version |
  
|
42 | 36.84% |
| Voters: 114. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
12-23-2004, 03:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU NL Tourny
I voted Harrington. It isn't because he is weak, because he isn't. Its just that someone with that tight of a style is at a disadvantage in heads-up. I think Raymer said that by the time he got to the final table, he thought that Arieh was far more dangerous than Dan because he was more imaginative. Its hard to adjust to heads up when you play a crazy tight style like Harrington. So definitely Harrington, and definitely NOT Negreanu or Ivey.
|
|
#2
12-23-2004, 09:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: HU NL Tourny
[ QUOTE ]
I voted Harrington. It isn't because he is weak, because he isn't. Its just that someone with that tight of a style is at a disadvantage in heads-up. I think Raymer said that by the time he got to the final table, he thought that Arieh was far more dangerous than Dan because he was more imaginative. Its hard to adjust to heads up when you play a crazy tight style like Harrington. So definitely Harrington, and definitely NOT Negreanu or Ivey. [/ QUOTE ] Every time I read something like this, I picture Harrington coming over the top of a raise at the final table with 62o, causing David Williams to lay down AQ. It makes me chuckle.
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
