Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-21-2004, 12:53 PM
AceHigh AceHigh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,173
Default Re: Hand to Talk About

I dunno, I can only guess that our hero had a small pair (66/55/44) and decided since he wasn't able to isolate it would be to expensive and too likely he was behind to call down.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-21-2004, 02:39 PM
anatta anatta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 671
Default Re: Hand to Talk About

The problem for hero is of course the BB. I can see hero's fold as correct if:

1. BB is a tight ABC player who wouldn't expand his requirements for cold-calling a three-bet in an isolation situation.

2. BB is a tough player who is aware of what is going on, still probably has a better hand than hero's i.e. KJ or AT, and hero doesn't like being traped between maniac and tough player with a hand that has a good chance of being dominated or even drawing practically dead.

I would also like to add that although not that likely, you cannot eliminate a big pair for BB despite no four-bet since many players would just call here since he cannot elimate the maniac, and just calling increases expectation post flop, and the maniac may four-bet the pot anyways. (cap is five in vegas so I think I might four-bet AA-QQ if I were the BB in vegas but just call, rather than cap, in Cali since maniacs are more likely to cap "since its gonna get capped anyways...".)
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-21-2004, 02:44 PM
sthief09 sthief09 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem (mets are 9-13, currently on a 1 game winning streak)
Posts: 1,245
Default Re: Hand to Talk About

Did you have any read on the BB? I think that's among the most important factors here. A tricky player could have a big pair, a straightforward player could have something like AK or JJ, or a loose player could have a wide range of hands. If BB is a LAG, then there's good reason to fear a raise behind him.

Under most circumstances, I think a hand like Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]J [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] that he used to isolate the maniac with, has become pretty worthless. I don't understand why everyone is immediately saying the BB made a terrible play without having even the slightest understanding of the BB.

Also, what were the table conditions? Were most players allowing the others to isolate him?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-21-2004, 02:45 PM
sthief09 sthief09 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem (mets are 9-13, currently on a 1 game winning streak)
Posts: 1,245
Default Re: Hand to Talk About

[ QUOTE ]
Not much discussion here. The hero is an idiot.

[/ QUOTE ]

don't you think that's a bit much given no read on the BB? a tight BB will have a hand like QJ, KJ, or KQ dominated often, and against an aggressive BB, Hero will be putting 1 SB on the flop and often have to fold for 2 more when it comes back to him.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-21-2004, 02:54 PM
rory rory is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 29
Default Re: Hand to Talk About

Actually I thought about it a little more walking to work-- if I was the BB and I had AA or KK I might think about playing it the way the BB did. I might not want to cap preflop and risk having the UTG fold. I also can trap the 3-bettor for a few extra bets on the flop by check-raising UTG on the flop or even waiting until the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-21-2004, 02:58 PM
Clarkmeister Clarkmeister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,247
Default Re: Hand to Talk About

[ QUOTE ]
Not much discussion here. The hero is an idiot.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hard to disagree with this one.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-21-2004, 03:30 PM
Gabe Gabe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 680
Default Re: Hand to Talk About

Okay, I give up. What did he have?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-21-2004, 03:34 PM
Diplomat Diplomat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Frozen Wasteland (Kingston, Ontario)
Posts: 1,225
Default Re: Hand to Talk About

[ QUOTE ]
Hi Mason,

Not much discussion here. The hero is an idiot.

Best regards,

Sucker

[/ QUOTE ]

Even if he had a hand like KJ?

-Diplomat
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-21-2004, 04:41 PM
bads33d bads33d is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 192
Default Re: Hand to Talk About

ok ok, maniac shows 72 offsuit...
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-21-2004, 05:08 PM
NabO NabO is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 0
Default Re: Hand to Talk About

Ok Mason, the results of the hand is the following: sb raise and beats maniac with JJ [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.