|
View Poll Results: Call or Fold? | |||
Call | 50 | 81.97% | |
Fold | 11 | 18.03% | |
Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How bad is this laydown?
PokerStars Game #3163450994: Tournament #15653383, Hold'em No Limit - Level III (25/50) - 2005/11/26 - 12:28:17 (ET)
Table '15653383 1' Seat #5 is the button Seat 1: goochman79 (1715 in chips) Seat 2: little momo (2265 in chips) Seat 3: Fresh8306 (1100 in chips) Seat 4: 4OOZ (890 in chips) Seat 5: lakeday (1320 in chips) Seat 6: LadyAceHigh (1650 in chips) Seat 7: Swatkiller (2045 in chips) Seat 8: bogaras (1220 in chips) Seat 9: hump68 (1295 in chips) LadyAceHigh: posts small blind 25 Swatkiller: posts big blind 50 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to little momo [Jd Td] bogaras: calls 50 hump68: folds goochman79: calls 50 little momo: calls 50 Fresh8306: calls 50 4OOZ: raises 840 to 890 and is all-in lakeday: folds LadyAceHigh: calls 865 Swatkiller: folds bogaras: folds goochman79: folds little momo: folds Fresh8306: folds |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How bad is this laydown?
It's obvious. What the hell are you on? You're not the next Phil Hellmuth just for folding this, you should have folded in the first place and not limped in fact, but limping isn't as terrible as calling TWO ALL INS would be.
Jesus come on get a clue, this is a fold every time. NOT EVEN CLOSE. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How bad is this laydown?
I don't think limping is bad, if it's a passive table.
But there's no question about whether to call the all-in or not... I would only call if I had a hot girl in bed waiting for me.... in fact, I might just check "post and fold" and logout. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How bad is this laydown?
I only said 'should', meaning, 'most times this is a fold'. Yes of course, there's the odd occasion when you should limp this, but I don't like it from MP very much at all.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How bad is this laydown?
This is an auto-fold, dude. You have a Jack-high!
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How bad is this laydown?
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think limping is bad, if it's a passive table. [/ QUOTE ] yeah but if op feels the urge to call in this situation with an allin and coldcall ahead with his JTs then surely he should be folding rather than limping to avoid situations where he would otherwise donk off his chips. but i agree, for someone that is postflop savvy i dont mind the pf limp with relatively deep stacks. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How bad is this laydown?
It's an easy call after the 2 pushes. Call it, get broke, stop posting.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How bad is this laydown?
Are you serious?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How bad is this laydown?
This isn't a serious question is it
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How bad is this laydown?
Thanks I have a new name for my buddy list
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|