#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pokerroom vs. Party rake analysis at $2/$4 (Pokerrom 73% higher!)
Method, I took 3 "average" tables from Pokertracker and the first 60 hands of each table. I applied the 180 hands to the rake structure of both Party and Pokerroom.
The rake taken percentage on average as size of the pot is as follows: Party Poker: 3.36% Pokerrrom: 5.84% Average table defined by taking average pot over 40,000 hands. Found the 3 tables closest to this that had a large enough sample size. Pot$ Pokerroom Party 2 $0.00 $0.00 4 $0.00 $0.00 6 $0.00 $0.00 8 $0.80 $0.00 10 $0.80 $0.00 12 $0.80 $0.00 14 $0.80 $0.00 16 $0.80 $0.00 18 $0.80 $0.00 20 $0.80 $1.00 22 $0.80 $1.00 24 $2.00 $1.00 26 $2.00 $1.00 28 $2.00 $1.00 30 $2.00 $1.50 32 $2.00 $1.50 34 $2.00 $1.50 36 $2.00 $1.50 38 $2.00 $1.50 40 $2.00 $2.00 42 $2.00 $2.00 44 $2.00 $2.00 46 $2.00 $2.00 48 $3.00 $2.00 50 $3.00 $2.50 52 $3.00 $2.50 54 $3.00 $2.50 56 $3.00 $2.50 58 $3.00 $2.50 60 $3.00 $3.00 62 $3.00 $3.00 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerroom vs. Party rake analysis at $2/$4 (Pokerrom 73% higher!)
But you have to remember it is more fair now!
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerroom vs. Party rake analysis at $2/$4 (Pokerrom 73% higher!)
hey pokerroom..respond to this thread!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerroom vs. Party rake analysis at $2/$4 (Pokerrom 73% higher!)
screw those greedy pokerroom people. before, only their site was crappy and bonus totally blew.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerroom vs. Party rake analysis at $2/$4 (Pokerrom 73% higher!)
Haahahhahahah good one [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] .
Good job Uglyowl. Those greedy foookers. This shite ain't gonna fly PokerRoom. Can you hear us? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerroom vs. Party rake analysis at $2/$4 (Pokerrom 73% higher!)
FWIW, it costs the average player 1.4bb/100 over the Party structure!
Try overcoming that, especially the marginally winning players like myself. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerroom vs. Party rake analysis at $2/$4 (Pokerrom 73% higher!)
Actually it IS more fair now:
Pokerroom is 73% worse than Party before considering rake. Pokeroom rake is 73% worse than Party. Sounds fair to me . . . |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerroom vs. Party rake analysis at $2/$4 (Pokerrom 73% higher!)
[ QUOTE ]
FWIW, it costs the average player 1.4bb/100 over the Party structure! [/ QUOTE ] Can you please explain how you arrived at that figure? I'm not questioning the conclusion, necessarily, I'm just having a hard time figuring out how you moved from a pot percentage to big bets per hundred hands. Thanks. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerroom vs. Party rake analysis at $2/$4 (Pokerrom 73% higher!)
Sure no problem.
Using my analysis the extra rake is $0.548/hand. The average player wins 10 of 100 hands say paying an extry $5.48. $5.48/$4 (lost rake/big bet) = 1.37bb/100 extra lost If you need anything else clarified I will be happy to. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerroom vs. Party rake analysis at $2/$4 (Pokerrom 73% higher!)
from datamining and I have learned over time that the average player at Party pays ~2.44bb/100 or $9.76 per 100 hands in rake at $2-4 LHE -dont forget this is from a sample with 30K players so that includes alot of losers that play too many hands [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
how does that fit in to your data owl? nice job |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|