Online cheaters

[shawn_p]

Seeing this site made me raise an eyebrow. What do you guys think about this?
This

[Bill Smith]

He's using eMachines. He can't be that smart.

[astroglide]

it needs a couple mini fridges and a urinal trough, they're way inefficient

[largeeyes]

WTF is it?

[Grisgra]

Massive collusion network apparently. Wonder what games they hit. And whether it really works. I can certainly see it working in the AA vs KK instance, but . . .

As an obvious side note, this Russ guy seems like quite the ass.

[augie00]

Here at school a guy was telling me about two guys that collude on party sng's. I said to tell the guys that if they ever meet me, they're getting a beat down. That's how I deal with online cheaters.

[elindauer]

[ QUOTE ]
Here at school a guy was telling me about two guys that collude on party sng's.

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't worry about it, they're probably doing it wrong anyways. I've spent far too many hours looking at tournament mathematics, and to sum up, cheating in tournaments can be highly counter-intuitive.


Good luck.
Eric

[NLSoldier]

Didnt someone post that link a few weeks ago?

FWIW I think the advantage of colluding is WAY overrated by most players. This is probably because most colluders don't know much about the game in the first place which is why they resort to cheating.

[OnlinePokerCoach]

He has said that he does not cheat the 15/30 games at Party/Empire (because the stakes are too small), so lower limit players clearly need not worry. Of course, you cannot trust a cheater, so he could very well be lying with this statement too.

OPC

[shawn_p]

Boiler room artical