Who has the most posts?

[mason55]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Plus ca change

Plus c'est la meme chose

[/ QUOTE ]

Is that a biased SF Giants fan's opinion?

[/ QUOTE ]

Nice call

[imported_anacardo]

[ QUOTE ]
Plus ca change

Plus c'est la meme chose

[/ QUOTE ]

You're a [censored] sicko.

Any number of us would be happy to give you a thorough going over, so you've chosen a smart strategy, you [censored] pussy piece of [censored].

[tonypaladino]

[ QUOTE ]
Your question, and the question below you are for Mat to answer.

Basically, [censored] proposed that he be a mod and ban people as per his desire, the vast majority of OOT posters thought this would be a great idea, Mat agreed and bannings commenced (and OOT got a lot better).

[/ QUOTE ]

If by "vast majority" you mean "vocal minority" then I agree.

[CCass]

[ QUOTE ]
If moderation can't be unbiased, it shouldn't be done at all. As I said a few times in the Paul Phllips thread....

2003'er here. I lurked for a few months before I registered.

[/ QUOTE ]

I registered on 8/13/03, so I got you by 2 days.

[bugstud]

winner?

[housenuts]

why was jake banned?

[zephed]

[ QUOTE ]
Boo to [censored] for that.
[img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
Bring back jake.

[imported_anacardo]

He's back. Just a new incarnation, that's all, and he mostly stays away from OOT.

[tonypaladino]

If I know Jake he's lurking here.

I don't know him though. Not at all.

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[ChipWrecked]

I know that he is, because I've received a PM from him inspired by a post I made; which showed me that jake is cool, and should not have been [censored]. If nothing else, there was debate about jake's posts, which proved some of us got a kick out of his torrent.

As a third shift worker on the Left Coast, jake's arrival in the morning was a welcome sight; it meant my workday was nearing an end.

[censored] [censored].