#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
[ QUOTE ]
The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means? [/ QUOTE ] outs as in short for suckouts??? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] equity (%) win (%) tie (%) Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd } Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s } [/ QUOTE ] What is this crap? Let me explain this simply for you retards. SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY! HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!! [/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding. [/ QUOTE ] http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_O...ands_Chart.asp [/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem? [/ QUOTE ] ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD. [/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means? [/ QUOTE ] Sponger has a pair. His opponent has Jack-high. DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!! |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
[ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair. His opponent has Jack-high. DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!! [/ QUOTE ] |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
Wow. No wonder the games are so soft. The people here don't even know the hand rankings!
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
Lol. I'm a favorite.....LOL!!!
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
I based my answer on this particular sentence.
"Just another example of me making an incredible read with a marginal hand, and having some stupid moron suckout on me. God I [censored] hate poker. " You are a 3:1 underdog... If you had won, you would have been the sucker. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
[ QUOTE ]
I based my answer on this particular sentence. "Just another example of me making an incredible read with a marginal hand, and having some stupid moron suckout on me. God I [censored] hate poker. " You are a 3:1 underdog... If you had won, you would have been the sucker. [/ QUOTE ] Dude, you need to go buy a poker book or something. Or maybe just a HAND RANKINGS chart so you understand what the f you are talking about. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
[ QUOTE ]
I thought this post would be funny till i read all the responses... [/ QUOTE ] The responses are what makes reading this thread worth while. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
[ QUOTE ]
I based my answer on this particular sentence. "Just another example of me making an incredible read with a marginal hand, and having some stupid moron suckout on me. God I [censored] hate poker. " You are a 3:1 underdog... If you had won, you would have been the sucker. [/ QUOTE ] You really need to start the 2+2 experience in a different section, newb |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
The OP is classic. Check out this other post: Link to earlier rant.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|