#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mr. Sklansky: Surprised by Your \"Answer\" / Have Another Question
[ QUOTE ]
Ahahaha. [/ QUOTE ] Please give an example where a Physics PHD varies from a correct use of logic when attempting to prove his point. Your ewe mating call above doesn't hack it. Vince |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mr. Sklansky: Surprised by Your \"Answer\" / Have Another Question
"would it be fair to say that jennifer harman and annie duke are not likely to make your list but have managed to be succesful in poker anyway? "
Jennifer is well above average. Annie is smarter still. Top 30 probably. Only female gambler who is smarter is Mika Ladove. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mr. Sklansky: Surprised by Your \"Answer\" / Have Another Question
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Ahahaha. [/ QUOTE ] Please give an example where a Physics PHD varies from a correct use of logic when attempting to prove his point. Your ewe mating call above doesn't hack it. Vince [/ QUOTE ] Vince, I've read you're a really nice guy, and I believe it. I wasn't attacking you, just reacting to the Ph.D. thing. In my experience, Ph.D.'s are not much less likely to waver from the path of pure logic than anyone else. A typical engineering dissertation defense can include crying, pleading, cajoling, yelling, name calling, threats, bribery, and other assorted unseemly conduct. In other contexts, when these forms of persuasion fail, resort is sometimes made to backstabbing, brown-nosing, sabotage and other cheap tricks. When all else fails, the ultimate argument is made in the form of a lawsuit. They do seem to play a little nicer over in physics, though. BTW, niether "ahahaha" or "ewe mating call" are good examples of purely logical argument, though perhaps slightly elevated compared to the typical level of discourse here. Your friend in logic, uuDevil [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mr. Sklansky: Surprised by Your \"Answer\" / Have Another Question
Devil,
Never confuse me with someone that understands logic. Vince |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Answers
[ QUOTE ]
Also, at most two of those three have IQs way above average. [/ QUOTE ] May I ask which one isn't? I'm pretty sure Slim is very smart, at least based on what I've read. Justin A |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question to David Sklansky re. Something You Said About IQ/Poker
[ QUOTE ]
For instance, many novices could probably become Expert chess players, or AAA ball players , or winning 30-60 poker players [/ QUOTE ] Not true at all. Sports are strange in that there is a very large number of people who spend years and years of time devoted to that sport. Most baseball players for instance never get a chance to play professional baseball, let alone AAA. Justin A |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Answers
By the way, I was friends with the late Tony Miles, Britain's greatest ever Chess player. He famously beat Karpov after an opening move of H4! I would not say he was particularly smart, although possibly my judgement was hindered by his alcohol and mental problems.
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question to David Sklansky re. Something You Said About IQ/Poker
OK thanks for the correction; I did not know AAA was so elite. Say "A" ball then?
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Answers
[ QUOTE ]
[Tony Miles] famously beat Karpov after an opening move of H4! [/ QUOTE ] The move was a6, but it's still pretty crazy. Here's the game, with annotations by Miles: http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1068157 |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Answers
OK, I'll bite. . . Who's the dummy?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|