|
|
|
|
#1
12-09-2005, 05:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party High Stakes Winners and Losers (datamined)
nice work. I would be interested in seeing, if you wanted to post it, a screenshot of this data sorted by hands played. While we wouldnt be seeing the *biggest* winners and loser, we could probably have a more intelligent discussion about who is winning and who is losing in that game.
peace john nickle 
|
|
#2
12-09-2005, 07:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
More data sorted by hands played
[ QUOTE ]
nice work. I would be interested in seeing, if you wanted to post it, a screenshot of this data sorted by hands played. While we wouldnt be seeing the *biggest* winners and loser, we could probably have a more intelligent discussion about who is winning and who is losing in that game. peace john nickle [/ QUOTE ] Good idea!  
|
|
#4
12-10-2005, 04:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: More data sorted by hands played
[ QUOTE ]
Based on how few people have really good bb/100 over a good chunk of hands, I'd say the 100/200 game doesn't look so great. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah that's surprising. Is it impossible to run really good in that game?
|
|
#5
12-10-2005, 04:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: More data sorted by hands played
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Based on how few people have really good bb/100 over a good chunk of hands, I'd say the 100/200 game doesn't look so great. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah that's surprising. Is it impossible to run really good in that game? [/ QUOTE ] stevieg is at 4bb/100....sustainable? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] Barron
|
|
#6
12-11-2005, 04:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: More data sorted by hands played
[ QUOTE ]
Based on how few people have really good bb/100 over a good chunk of hands, I'd say the 100/200 game doesn't look so great. [/ QUOTE ] you'd think so, but sometimes the games are real, real good. last night jinberg, holybolty, kennyj, and pd51323515 (or whatever) were at both tables. i'd only need two of these players at the tables to sit down. PS how the hell is jinberg a winner on both of Enon's lists. he is plain awful. there's no way he should even be a winner over 10K hands. if he is a 2p2er i apologize in advance, but i doubt it.
|
|
#7
12-09-2005, 07:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party High Stakes Winners and Losers (datamined)
Thats impressive that drspud has won so much with a W$SD of only 49%. He must be getting a lot of bets in when he has the best of it and getting to showdown cheap when he's behind.
|
|
#8
12-09-2005, 08:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party High Stakes Winners and Losers (datamined)
W$SD of 49 doesn't mean you're losing player. I had have numbers below 50% up to 30/60 limit (where i start to fold more) and was a winner at all limits.
|
|
#9
12-09-2005, 08:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party High Stakes Winners and Losers (datamined)
I feel pretty dumb now for posting this.
I've been informed by a few sources that the data isn't an accurate portrayal of even the the month that I've been datamining it. According to GAescapee, Kukavica is up 40k amount over about 7k hands yet is down a massive amount over 20k. I don't get it. Nevertheless, I will continue trying to datamine this game as much as possible and may try to set up a single computer with the main fuction being datamining various high limit games online 24/7. Are there any programmers out there willing to assist in a project like this who could create a program that manually reopens certain poker tables when they get automatically closed by PartyPoker? Does something like this already exist?
|
|
#10
12-09-2005, 08:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party High Stakes Winners and Losers (datamined)
it exists. it's called partymine. i agree that this post is better-suited for nvg.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
