|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: idea
what's with the new, nicer, more informative KKF?
inquiring minds want to know. fim |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: idea
[ QUOTE ]
create a new I.D., continue to post, see if you still get called out, if so, then its pausible that their attacks arent personal. [/ QUOTE ] I would if I cared enough. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: idea
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] create a new I.D., continue to post, see if you still get called out, if so, then its pausible that their attacks arent personal. [/ QUOTE ] I would if I cared enough. [/ QUOTE ] I dont really like associating myself with this type of flame war online, as it's fairly stupid to get that emotional about an ONLINE ARGUMENT, but - Richie, the fact that you keep posting "why?" and various links and responding to everyone involved clearly shows you do, in fact, care. KKF's advice is solid in that regaurd - if you truly feel el diablo / et al are attacking YOU, make a new name, and in a month show what a horrible person he is. Or, and what I think will happen, show that he's not horrible whatsoever and really just a knowledgeable poker player. BTW, Im not a "richie hater," and I doubt any of these posters are, as well. Annoyed? Maybe. Hateful? No. Good day! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: idea
BobboFitos- thanks for your message. I hear what you're saying, but I can assure you that this is not getting emotional. Semi-interesting, maybe.
Glad to hear you're not a "richie hater". Perhaps the people's "annoyance" stems from me and Diablo disagreeing in a couple of posts. And despite his condescending/witty/patronizing tone, Diablo is still the people's favorite. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: idea
Diablo is still the people's favorite.
I thought I was [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] And, are you Chris Brown in disguise [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] William [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ATTN: Richie Rich Haters
I think you're missing the point. people are not hating on you here, they're just blown away at the fact that you offer simplistic advice in complex situations and then, to your own detriment, insist that things are as such even when faced with overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
everyone is wrong from time to time. its how you handle being wrong that has so many people lining up to yell at you. fim |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ATTN: Richie Rich Haters
[ QUOTE ]
I think you're missing the point. people are not hating on you here, they're just blown away at the fact that you offer simplistic advice in complex situations and then, to your own detriment, insist that things are as such even when faced with overwhelming evidence to the contrary. [/ QUOTE ] Example? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ATTN: Richie Rich Haters
all the twodimes stuff you posted. AA vs 87, 88, etc.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ATTN: Richie Rich Haters
Please explain.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ATTN: Richie Rich Haters
justifying calling a raise with 87 because if the opponent has AA you are 20% to win and have "implied odds". you were wrong about that, or at least wrong when you just posted the stats only.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|