|
|
|
|
#1
11-27-2005, 07:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 150/300 hand
[ QUOTE ]
Bob, I would probably call a river raise. What hand does he smoothcall the turn with that raises the river? The play makes no sense and will be a bluff enough times to call IMO. Surf [/ QUOTE ] I'm not Bob, but I would say JJ or TT might smoothcall the turn. Hero's bet looks like "I think you have AK and I have a pair, and I don't want you to get a free card." If villian interprets it this way, and he has JJ or TT, hero is drawing dead. He also probably knows that BK is capable of bet/folding a pair on the turn, and might wait with a set. I don't think this villian ever raises the river without a better hand. lf 
|
|
#2
11-27-2005, 07:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 150/300 hand
I didn't look at villains description when I made that post. Thanks for correcting me.
Against a normal, LAGy opponent I would expect it to be a bluff often enough to call b/c it is such an odd line. Against a tight/passive I agree a fold is best. Surf
|
|
#3
11-27-2005, 08:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 150/300 hand
i bet/fold the river like most other people since ace-high is checking behind but probably calling a bet... why didn't you play the flop faster, though? i'm really curious, since i usually go apeshit on flops like that.
|
|
#4
11-27-2005, 08:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 150/300 hand
If I thought that that the villian was aggressive enough to bluff-raise the river, I would check/call. I don't think this hand is good enough often enough to warrant 2 big bets on the river.
lf
|
|
#5
11-27-2005, 07:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 150/300 hand
Versus that player, with your hand, I think your plan should be to cause more trouble on a flop that allows you to do so.
River - Guys like him will check behind with some hands that beat you, so checking the river is not terrible. But there are enough A-high hands that he could have that he might call with, so I would value bet, and fold to a raise.
|
|
#6
11-27-2005, 07:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 150/300 hand
Check call to induce a bluff. I don't think he's calling with anything you beat here.
|
|
#7
11-27-2005, 07:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 150/300 hand
This villian has an AF of 1.0 in short handed games. He's not betting anything hero beats here. If BK checks and the villian bets, its a clear fold.
He might, however, call w/ a whiffed A-high not believing hero donked a pair. If BK is putting one bet in on this river, it needs to be as the bettor. lf
|
|
#8
11-27-2005, 08:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 150/300 hand
[ QUOTE ]
This villian has an AF of 1.0 in short handed games. He's not betting anything hero beats here. If BK checks and the villian bets, its a clear fold. He might, however, call w/ a whiffed A-high not believing hero donked a pair. If BK is putting one bet in on this river, it needs to be as the bettor. lf [/ QUOTE ] Even 1 AFs find it hard not to bet a checked river with just with ace high when the obvious draws miss.
|
|
#9
11-27-2005, 08:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 150/300 hand
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] This villian has an AF of 1.0 in short handed games. He's not betting anything hero beats here. If BK checks and the villian bets, its a clear fold. He might, however, call w/ a whiffed A-high not believing hero donked a pair. If BK is putting one bet in on this river, it needs to be as the bettor. lf [/ QUOTE ] Even 1 AFs find it hard not to bet a checked river with just with ace high when the obvious draws miss. [/ QUOTE ] That doesn't make sense. Why would villian bet A hi on river when its not for value and a weaker hand wouldn't call? lil feller is right. If BK is putting one bet in on this river, it needs to be as the bettor.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
