#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much would a good player\'s hourly rate be at $2-$4?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] (2.4bb per hour)(4 tables)($4)=$38.4 per hour. [/ QUOTE ] $38 ph sounds great; but given the huge rake at 2/4, (almost) no-one can make 2.4BB/hr 4 tabling. [/ QUOTE ] I'm about to move up. I should have moved up a long, long time ago but I'm just so comfortable at 2/4. Stay at 2/4 long enough at you'll be beating it for as much. [/ QUOTE ] Are you playing 6 max or full? If full, 4BB/100 4 tabling is just not achievable (IMHO) longterm, however long I, or almost anyone, was to play it. I have read posts in the Mid-High forum that suggest a good 30/60 player would not be able to achieve this, given the rake. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much would a good player\'s hourly rate be at $2-$4?
[ QUOTE ]
I dont understand how any site can be any fishier than others unless they limit their games quite a bit and make micro players play 1/2 and 2/4. Kinda like how truepoker and the crypto's used to be. [/ QUOTE ] Pacific gets most of their advertising from casinos, if you play 3-6 in a real casino and suck, then go home and stake yourself online, and you're a fish who doesnt care about money, you gonna play at the casnio limits or the wimpy $.5-$1? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much would a good player\'s hourly rate be at $2-$4?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] (2.4bb per hour)(4 tables)($4)=$38.4 per hour. [/ QUOTE ] $38 ph sounds great; but given the huge rake at 2/4, (almost) no-one can make 2.4BB/hr 4 tabling. [/ QUOTE ] 130k hands I averaged 4.2BB/100 8 tabling, but we've been over this before. I am positive that 3.5/100 is possible in the games - retroactively to early 2005 I suppse. -SmileyEH |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much would a good player\'s hourly rate be at $2-$4?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] (2.4bb per hour)(4 tables)($4)=$38.4 per hour. [/ QUOTE ] $38 ph sounds great; but given the huge rake at 2/4, (almost) no-one can make 2.4BB/hr 4 tabling. [/ QUOTE ] 130k hands I averaged 4.2BB/100 8 tabling, but we've been over this before. I am positive that 3.5/100 is possible in the games - retroactively to early 2005 I suppse. -SmileyEH [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/ooo.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much would a good player\'s hourly rate be at $2-$4?
So there's quite a range of win rates here.
Let me make it easier to view: Limit $2-$4 Name Per hr per table Hours Played # Tables TomBrooks $4.64 51 1 Cumolonimbus $6 ? 8 silkyslim ~$2-$4 (unsure) ? 4-6 Ianco $9.60 142 4 Limit $3-$6 Name Per hour Hours Played dchild10 $9 ? Is that about right? Most of you are making at least one big bet per hour, or much more. Ianco, that is a very good winrate. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much would a good player\'s hourly rate be at $2-$4?
[ QUOTE ]
9$/hr single table 3-6 at pacific.... and i stress PACIFIC... the worst players in the world congregate here lol [/ QUOTE ] It's true. Pacific is a money mountain. The players are drunken maniacs and it's almost scary what they do. Too bad you can only play one table at a time there. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|