ZeeJustin has nothing on me (first 533 tracked at 109s)

[PickyTooth]

Maybe it's because you're a moron and people dont like you ?

[freemoney]

lol good thing i dont count on an anonymous forum to make friends...

[PickyTooth]

yet you count on it to boost your EGO

very logical

[raptor517]

[ QUOTE ]
lol because justin and curtains post similiar things with even better results and everyone wants to make out with them, i am met with only skepticism.

[/ QUOTE ]

i question every good run anyone ever posts. i think the numbers are ALWAYS bumped up a bit.. just my 2 cents. OH!!!, also, i dont suk anyones prack.. grats on the good run. holla

[freemoney]

lol your right this is stupid, i dont need this for my ego, i was just posting results over a good period and so many of you are jealous its sick, this forum sucks, pz

[Ryendal]

Greetings. I am proud of you, for all 2+2 readers !

[ZeeJustin]

The 100's are significantly softer than the 200's, and it would not really surprise me if 30% is attainable. I think it is very likely that the OP is on an insane heater, but he's certainly a solid winning player if these results are real, and as I said before, 30% may very well be attainable in the 100's.

For a while when I wasn't winning that much at the 200's, I found the 100's to be significantly more profitable for me. Call it ego, but I stuck with the 200's anyway, and probably lost a lot of EV as a result. I think a lot of 2+2ers would be better off playing the 100's than the 200's to be honest.

As for the issue of posting results, I have nothing against it (obviously). This is a public message board where people go for information, and this is the kind of information beginning players LOVE to see. I don't know why the OP was criticized so heavily for this.

[curtains]

I don't feel such a big diff between the 109s and 215s at all....I just dont see how it could be possibly twice as profitable to play in the 109s. I also don't think that by randomly entering 109s and 8 tabling, you can even dream of getting a 30% ROI over the long run.

Of course with stupid table selection and playing very few games anything is possible, but that's not really relevant anyway.

[raptor517]

[ QUOTE ]

I don't feel such a big diff between the 109s and 215s at all....I just dont see how it could be possibly twice as profitable to play in the 109s. I also don't think that by randomly entering 109s and 8 tabling, you can even dream of getting a 30% ROI over the long run.

Of course with stupid table selection and playing very few games anything is possible, but that's not really relevant anyway.

[/ QUOTE ]

i agree with world champion here. dead on. holla

[Sponger15SB]

[ QUOTE ]

I don't feel such a big diff between the 109s and 215s at all....I just dont see how it could be possibly twice as profitable to play in the 109s. I also don't think that by randomly entering 109s and 8 tabling, you can even dream of getting a 30% ROI over the long run.

Of course with stupid table selection and playing very few games anything is possible, but that's not really relevant anyway.

[/ QUOTE ]

really? talking to 2 $215 players the other day I was able to work out this detailed difference in skill level chart

$33- nothing - $55 - nothing - $109 - something - $215