#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Set under set under set. And i runner runner the flush.
Implied odds, not pot odds !!
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Set under set under set. And i runner runner the flush.
Good hand, but let's say he was going to raise it 5 or 6. I think you get his stack anyway when you coldcall PF.
I use a 10 or 12x ratio to evaluate what kind of profit is needed for a PP wanting a set, assuming you're not putting any more money in when you don't hit a set on the flop. So 6$ called PF : profit needed (assuming 10x) is 60$ on average to break even. 9$ called PF : 90$ So for a 3$ raise on the flop, your difference in overlay is -30$. This assumes you'll stack opponent regardless of your raise and calling the reraise, or simply limp-calling his raise. The way villain played it, you were getting his stack no matter what. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Set under set under set. And i runner runner the flush.
This is a very easy call preflop. Just beware the AK6 flop.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|