Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-08-2005, 02:48 AM
lapoker17 lapoker17 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 183
Default Re: time-pot hand

that 200 threshold seems ridiculous. in 10/20 nl games in LA it's $400.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-08-2005, 08:57 AM
Tommy Angelo Tommy Angelo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 1,048
Default Re: time-pot hand

"that 200 threshold seems ridiculous. in 10/20 nl games in LA it's $400."

It only seems ridiculous to you because it is foreign to you. Time pots and time pot thresholds are agreed upon by the players. To say that LA's thresholds are not ridiculous and that the bay area's thresholds are ridiculous is no different than an Englishman and an American telling each other that the other is ridiculous for driving on the "wrong" side of the road.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-08-2005, 01:57 PM
Tommy Angelo Tommy Angelo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 1,048
Default Re: time-pot hand / repost

This is a reposting of a post that came out ugly due to errant quote commands.

[ QUOTE ]
If you raise, and steal all the blinds, you don't have to pay time, how come that wasn't an option? Time pots are the nuts when you are running cold.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because if I raise, the first $20 of the money I put in the pot completes the small blind, which makes $200 in called money in the pot, so no matter what happens after that, someone will pay $63.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-2005, 12:15 AM
Matt Flynn Matt Flynn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 301
Default Re: time-pot hand

Beautiful. But no "accidental" show? They'd be folding TPTK for a week after that.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-08-2005, 12:22 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: time-pot hand

he must assume its loose enough that he wont be able to. but after talking about firing and winning regardless of cards, did you plan on not firing at this flop? do you think they were going to play back preflop knowing you just didnt want to pay time AND pick up the pot?

or is it considered a 200$ pot because you must 'put in' to raise it thus you owe regardless?
(forgive me ive never played a rake like this)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-08-2005, 02:59 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: time-pot hand

Tommy,

So when someone posts in the co for 60 and you have AKo in sb you just muck right? Cause you'll be out of position? Honestly I see very little difference in the situation. (I know the precise difference is 2 more players and that certainly doesn't make me want to muck)

I take the 20 into 120 here preflop with ako every time with stacks that are up to 5k deep. I don't see why 20 into 200 is fine but 20 into 120, oh no, fold time!

I am curious if the people who have responded with, classic, great fold, etc have any thoughts along those lines.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-08-2005, 09:17 AM
Tommy Angelo Tommy Angelo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 1,048
Default Re: time-pot hand

"So when someone posts in the co for 60 and you have AKo in sb you just muck right? Cause you'll be out of position? Honestly I see very little difference in the situation."

I see a huge difference. If I complete the small blind in your example, that's still only $140 in the pot. That's under the threshold, so yes, I would call or raise. If I end up winning the pot by showing my hand down after all streets gets checked, or by betting postflop (or raising preflop)causing them to fold, then I still don't pay the $63.

If in your example what you had in mind was that it is NOT a time pot, then again, I see a huge difference. If there is not going to be $63 taken out of the pot, then it's just a regular poker hand, and I would do whatever I would do if there was no such thing as time pots.

Can you think of a case where the fact that it's a time pot would affect your preflop play? If the answer is no, then fine, we're not on the same page at all. But if the answer is yes, then all we really differ on is the degree to which time-pots affect our preflop strategy.

Tommy
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-08-2005, 12:46 AM
mikech mikech is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 104
Default Re: time-pot hand

[ QUOTE ]
$20-40 blinds NLHE at Lucky Chances. The collection is $7 per player per half-hour. We almost always do time pots. If the pot has $200 (or more) of called money in it, then the winner of the pot pays the time for all players who do not have a missed blind button. (Players with a missed blind button pay their own $7.)

On this hand, it was a time pot, and the collection was $63.

[/ QUOTE ]
hi tommy,

that seems like a horrible time-pot structure. at the borgata 10-25 when we do time-pots, the first TWO qualifying pots go towards paying the time, and the threshold for qualifying is also higher than yours. they usually set the threshold at about 5x the total time to be paid, or 10x the time to be taken out of each pot. if there were $63 of time to be paid, for instance, the time-pots would be $32 and $31 at $300. if there's $81 total time (the borg charges $9 per half-hour) then it's $41 and $40 at $400.

so the burden of paying time comes out of two pots, not just one. and the percentage taken from each time-pot is only about 10%. in your game you'd have to pay $63 out of a $200 pot? i'd fold AKo too.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-08-2005, 11:02 AM
Apathy Apathy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 11
Default Re: time-pot hand

Tommy,

What kind of an extreme do you take this to?

If you get AA in the BB in your example and the SB folds (180 in the pot) would you just move in?

Apathy
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-08-2005, 01:08 PM
Tommy Angelo Tommy Angelo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 1,048
Default Re: time-pot hand

"What kind of an extreme do you take this to?

If you get AA in the BB in your example and the SB folds (180 in the pot) would you just move in?"

Yes.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.