#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QJs - a high variance play. Comments please.
Both players to act after the 3-bet have already invest one bet. I think this psychologically ties a lot players to seeing the turn. Reads would definitely make a difference here for me. If they were tight-asses I would just call and tie them to the turn, if they were loose fish, I have no hesitation in 3-betting it.
Even so, we only need the pot to be 3-way to have equity on our bets. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QJs - a high variance play. Comments please.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I don't 3 bet the flop. Its not like I can buy any outs. I think this is a situation to call the raise and hope the turn comes with something to get sexy with. [/ QUOTE ] The 3-bet is for value. We have an equity edge against 3+ opponents given the flush and (nut) gutshot draws. [/ QUOTE ] We do have an equity edge but we also stand to knock people out on the 3 bet as well and thus lose bets on the turn. I think the 3bet is close, but I only like if everyone is going to stay along for the ride. I think you fold people out facing 2 cold too often here, in which case we lose equity. [/ QUOTE ] Hero's equity is around 45% five people have put money in on the flop. One of those players raised and one cold called two. I don't think the flop 3-bet is anywhere near close even if a player or two folds. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QJs - a high variance play. Comments please.
[ QUOTE ]
What about the OESD that we just picked up? Shouldn't we have about 15 outs then, making us roughly 33%? [/ QUOTE ] Yes, I was thinking OESD/FD but 13 outs popped into my head for some reason, rather than 15. Thanks, post fixed. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QJs - a high variance play. Comments please.
[ QUOTE ]
Even so, we only need the pot to be 3-way to have equity on our bets. [/ QUOTE ] This is the crux of the matter. This pot is going to be at least three way to the turn, so the hero is getting value on his flop bets. I think he should go ahead and cap it if the opportunity arises. I don't think he has any fold equity on the turn, so on the turn, I think he can check. Although this makes it transparent that he has a draw, it doesn't tell the extent of his draw, and if he makes a straight, instead of the flush, I think he can still checkraise the river. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QJs - a high variance play. Comments please.
It's probably a fairly meaningless bet. You get called in two spots, you break pretty even. In three spots, you gain 1/3 of a BB or so, which is nice, but I suppose sometimes two guys fold or you get raised, which sucks. I guess it depends on how often each of things happen, but I suspect it works out to break fairly even from an EV standpoint, at least readless.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QJs - a high variance play. Comments please.
Hi TKO,
The flop 3-bet is mandatory. Well-played. However, betting the turn here is pretty much throwing away money. Happy holidays, einbert |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QJs - a high variance play. Comments please.
[ QUOTE ]
We only make our hand ~30-33% of the time on the river at this point [/ QUOTE ] How do you calculate this? Is this number of outs vs. what we have left in the deck? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QJs - a high variance play. Comments please.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] We only make our hand ~30-33% of the time on the river at this point [/ QUOTE ] How do you calculate this? Is this number of outs vs. what we have left in the deck? [/ QUOTE ] 46 cards left, so our odds are 1546-15) = 15:31, which is rougly 1:2 or 33%. A quicker method for a rough calculation is to take the number of outs and multiply by 4 on the flop or 2 on the turn. So 15x2 = 30%. This undershoots it a bit, so it's reasonable to use for "value" calculations. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QJs - a high variance play. Comments please.
[ QUOTE ]
The flop 3-bet is mandatory. Well-played. However, betting the turn here is pretty much throwing away money. Happy holidays, einbert [/ QUOTE ] Thanks; you too. I decided to 3-bet the flop against this particular lineup as they had already put in money and were very loose players. Had the button not called the CO's raises, I probably would have just called. I think the flop is a close decision either way. As for the turn, I would have check/called had the 9 stayed in the deck; however, the fact that I picked up 4 more outs changed my plan, and made me doubt the best play. I figured the pot was so large already that opponents would be calling with anything. I still think the turn is the most questionable street. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QJs - a high variance play. Comments please.
With all 12 outs being live, you have ~45% equity. This means you almost break even HU. Three-handed the edge is clear. So the flop bet definitely has value.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|