#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Simple NL situation - what\'s the ruling?
[ QUOTE ]
One version of NL rules requires that the raise be at least the size of of total previous bet. [/ QUOTE ] Is there any casino that uses this rule? I have never seen it. Every place I have played has used the size of the previous raise. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Simple NL situation - what\'s the ruling?
[ QUOTE ]
I understand why $160 (double the $80) or $200 (double the 100), but could someone tell me why $140? Thanks, Will [/ QUOTE ] Player four raised $40 on top. The minimum reraise is sometimes considered the last reraise (not including the all in in this case). So because Player two is all in for $100, Player four must make it at least $100 + $40 = $140. This is my understanding, at least. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Simple NL situation - what\'s the ruling?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] One version of NL rules requires that the raise be at least the size of of total previous bet. [/ QUOTE ] Is there any casino that uses this rule? I have never seen it. Every place I have played has used the size of the previous raise. [/ QUOTE ] I have not been there to confirm, but I believe Hawaiian Gardens uses that rule. It has fallen out of favor, but people that I respect in this industry have told me it is the prefered rule. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Simple NL situation - what\'s the ruling?
Player 3 can obviously do whatever the f he wants to do.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Simple NL situation - what\'s the ruling?
This seems pretty simple. I cant see anything "loaded" here. In both cases player three can fold, call or raise. If the all-in is 100 then raise is to 140, if 85 then atleast to 125.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Simple NL situation - what\'s the ruling?
Kick him in the nuts.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Simple NL situation - what\'s the ruling?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] One version of NL rules requires that the raise be at least the size of of total previous bet. [/ QUOTE ] Is there any casino that uses this rule? I have never seen it. Every place I have played has used the size of the previous raise. [/ QUOTE ] Harrah's in Kansas City uses this rule (unless it has changed recently). |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Simple NL situation - what\'s the ruling?
[ QUOTE ]
Kick him in the nuts. [/ QUOTE ] Kick me? Or kick Al? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Simple NL situation - what\'s the ruling?
[ QUOTE ]
Player 3 can obviously do whatever the f he wants to do. [/ QUOTE ] Depending on the casino and their rules, Player 3 and 4 may only just call and not re-raise since the last raise was less than half the amount of the previous re-raise before. In some casinos you can do what the f' you want. And yes, I say kick Al in the balls. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Lawrence |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Simple NL situation - what\'s the ruling?
OK. If the casino's rules say that an all-in raiser automatically wins the pot and everyone else has to fold, then Player 3 has to fold.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|