Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-27-2005, 12:35 AM
45suited 45suited is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: up to the 22s and 33s!
Posts: 1,395
Default Re: $55 - uneasy ITM spot with AT

The only thing is, I can't see standard raising unless you are willing to call a push from LAG bigstack in the SB.

Otherwise, you're just donating chips to the bigstack.

What's your plan if you raise to 300 and bigstack pushes? Do you expect him to push any two to a standard raise?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-27-2005, 12:58 AM
microbet microbet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,360
Default Re: $55 - uneasy ITM spot with AT

I just push. I don't want to limp and let both of them in cheap or free look. A raise to 250+ is pretty commiting. If SB is so loose I probably can't fold to him. Maybe, if BB is real tight I can raise to 200 and fold if he pushes. Still I like pushing better because I want things like 55 to fold.

Which brings me to...blue, your thinking sound a little strange, as if hero's action changes SB's cards. If SB has 55 I'd much rather push and have him fold than raise and have him reraise.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-27-2005, 01:03 AM
bluefeet bluefeet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: galapagos islands of course
Posts: 825
Default Re: $55 - uneasy ITM spot with AT

yeah, some pretty muddled rambling there. i don't think your point MB was my intent.

i propose push.

he mentioned "not being desperate" (or something to that effect) regarding the not pushing arguement. i was trying to make the point that with a "standard" raise and a whiff, he was essentially looking at laying the hand down (minus a few hundred chips). with the blinds raking through after this one, he's basically pushing with less next orbit. i personally do not like raising. i could fold easier than raising. but i push [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-27-2005, 01:20 AM
Isura Isura is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 69
Default Re: $55 - uneasy ITM spot with AT

[ QUOTE ]
i personally do not like raising. i could fold easier than raising. but i push

[/ QUOTE ]

I really think that folding is much worse than limping.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-27-2005, 01:32 AM
Chaostracize Chaostracize is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 160
Default Re: $55 - uneasy ITM spot with AT

Limping is worse than cutting off your feet like in the movie Saw which is a horrible movie but not as horrible as limping.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-27-2005, 01:48 AM
Isura Isura is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 69
Default Re: $55 - uneasy ITM spot with AT

[ QUOTE ]
Limping is worse than cutting off your feet like in the movie Saw which is a horrible movie but not as horrible as limping.

[/ QUOTE ]

Meh. What's wrong with playing a fairly strong hand for 1/13 of our stack IN POSITION in a 3-handed poker game? I'm not saying limping is the best, but it's certainly better than folding.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-27-2005, 01:05 AM
valenzuela valenzuela is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 453
Default Re: $55 - uneasy ITM spot with AT

LOL..i was going to say the exact same thing..which 55 as an example as well.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-27-2005, 01:05 AM
45suited 45suited is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: up to the 22s and 33s!
Posts: 1,395
Default Re: $55 - uneasy ITM spot with AT

I agree with Microbet and others. My default play is to just push here. Take away any inkling that the bigstack has to mess with me.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.