#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very Passive w/ KK (Party 30)
Bet the river.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very Passive w/ KK (Party 30)
[ QUOTE ]
Bet the river. [/ QUOTE ] I think the idea here relates to clarkmeister's: if he bets this river, any non-diamond hand his opponent will fold, but he might take a stab at the pot if he checks here. I think (time lag takes a stab at the pot) > (time lag calls a bet with trash) in general. Plus, if the LAG takes a stab at the pot with a low diamond (7 or 8 or 9) and Hero raises him, he will call for an extra bet. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very Passive w/ KK (Party 30)
Ok, everyone says bet the river, but what actual hands do you guys think he checks behind that would call a bet? What hands do you think bet and call a c/r? What hands bet and fold? Say this guy's capping range is something like AKo, AKS, AA-88.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very Passive w/ KK (Party 30)
[ QUOTE ]
what actual hands do you guys think he checks behind that would call a bet? [/ QUOTE ] Pretty much everything. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very Passive w/ KK (Party 30)
Bet the river. Definitely. This guy is definitely calling you down. What else is he three betting the flop with? He probably hit a set and will pay you off.
No one suggested betting the turn - great opportunity for a semi bluff. If you get raised, you are still even money to hit by the river. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very Passive w/ KK (Party 30)
check/calling this flop seems really passive to me. Someone please explain to me why c/r or leading is wrong here.
Thx! [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very Passive w/ KK (Party 30)
[ QUOTE ]
i think it was played fine -- being a lag player he would bet with a lot more hands on the river then he would call with - cheers [/ QUOTE ] I doubt it. Villain capped PF so he has a hand with value. He would only bet this river as a bluff, but he will not have a hand he wants to bluff with. He wants to see the showdown cheaply with anything from two pair to a lower flush. It is possible he would bet a diamond, but I don't think he'd call a c/r with a diamond. Therefore it's better to bet, to extract value from a diamond or a worse holding. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very Passive w/ KK (Party 30)
[ QUOTE ]
check/calling this flop seems really passive to me. Someone please explain to me why c/r or leading is wrong here. [/ QUOTE ] What hands are you beating on this flop? You really think the opponent made a goofy cap with 99 or AQ signficiantly more often than he caps with AA, AK, QQ, TT and JJ? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very Passive w/ KK (Party 30)
Please explain why a semi-bluff flop raise is a bad thing?
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very Passive w/ KK (Party 30)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] what actual hands do you guys think he checks behind that would call a bet? [/ QUOTE ] Pretty much everything. [/ QUOTE ]i completely disagree. sometimes it sucks to checkcheckcheck the nuts, but in this hand i dont thing a single decision was poor. well played, IMO. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|