Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-02-2005, 11:29 AM
ggbman ggbman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 605
Default Re: Very Passive w/ KK (Party 30)

Bet the river.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-02-2005, 12:15 PM
baronzeus baronzeus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Palo Alto, CA/Bay101
Posts: 2,675
Default Re: Very Passive w/ KK (Party 30)

[ QUOTE ]
Bet the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think the idea here relates to clarkmeister's: if he bets this river, any non-diamond hand his opponent will fold, but he might take a stab at the pot if he checks here.

I think (time lag takes a stab at the pot) > (time lag calls a bet with trash) in general.

Plus, if the LAG takes a stab at the pot with a low diamond (7 or 8 or 9) and Hero raises him, he will call for an extra bet.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-02-2005, 02:40 PM
ike ike is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 191
Default Re: Very Passive w/ KK (Party 30)

Ok, everyone says bet the river, but what actual hands do you guys think he checks behind that would call a bet? What hands do you think bet and call a c/r? What hands bet and fold? Say this guy's capping range is something like AKo, AKS, AA-88.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-02-2005, 03:32 PM
The Dude The Dude is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: My new favorite people to hate: Angels fans.
Posts: 582
Default Re: Very Passive w/ KK (Party 30)

[ QUOTE ]
what actual hands do you guys think he checks behind that would call a bet?

[/ QUOTE ]
Pretty much everything.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-02-2005, 05:43 PM
gm4351 gm4351 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: Very Passive w/ KK (Party 30)

Bet the river. Definitely. This guy is definitely calling you down. What else is he three betting the flop with? He probably hit a set and will pay you off.

No one suggested betting the turn - great opportunity for a semi bluff. If you get raised, you are still even money to hit by the river.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-02-2005, 06:05 PM
Guruman Guruman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 228
Default Re: Very Passive w/ KK (Party 30)

check/calling this flop seems really passive to me. Someone please explain to me why c/r or leading is wrong here.

Thx! [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-02-2005, 07:38 PM
Marnixvdb Marnixvdb is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Eindhoven
Posts: 97
Default Re: Very Passive w/ KK (Party 30)

[ QUOTE ]
i think it was played fine --


being a lag player he would bet with a lot more hands on the river then he would call with -


cheers

[/ QUOTE ]

I doubt it. Villain capped PF so he has a hand with value. He would only bet this river as a bluff, but he will not have a hand he wants to bluff with. He wants to see the showdown cheaply with anything from two pair to a lower flush. It is possible he would bet a diamond, but I don't think he'd call a c/r with a diamond. Therefore it's better to bet, to extract value from a diamond or a worse holding.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-03-2005, 03:20 PM
bobbyi bobbyi is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 14
Default Re: Very Passive w/ KK (Party 30)

[ QUOTE ]
check/calling this flop seems really passive to me. Someone please explain to me why c/r or leading is wrong here.

[/ QUOTE ]
What hands are you beating on this flop? You really think the opponent made a goofy cap with 99 or AQ signficiantly more often than he caps with AA, AK, QQ, TT and JJ?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-03-2005, 03:58 PM
SoSo SoSo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Outer Space..
Posts: 97
Default Re: Very Passive w/ KK (Party 30)

Please explain why a semi-bluff flop raise is a bad thing?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-03-2005, 09:02 PM
flawless_victory flawless_victory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 144
Default Re: Very Passive w/ KK (Party 30)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
what actual hands do you guys think he checks behind that would call a bet?

[/ QUOTE ]
Pretty much everything.

[/ QUOTE ]i completely disagree. sometimes it sucks to checkcheckcheck the nuts, but in this hand i dont thing a single decision was poor. well played, IMO.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.