#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 99 vs a mega fish
If you just call that flop reraise which I'd probably do some of the time, then the Jack is a plenty decent card to be check raising the turn with. (and you should probably be raising most turns)
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 99 vs a mega fish
Yeah if your not gonna 3-bet the flop then checkraise the turn and that's right, the J is a plenty safe card to do this with. If he 3-bets you can find a fold here, but you are ahead alot of the time IMO.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 99 vs a mega fish
His aggression factor is 0.4. A cap on the flop is telling you there's something better than top pair.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 99 vs a mega fish
[ QUOTE ]
Folding as part of a play versus an ubber fish is flat out horrid. Especially with a solid pair relative to the board. [/ QUOTE ] Well, this uber fish has an aggression factor of 0.4. When a mega calling station wakes up and raises, you have to start to worry. That's why I advocate the three bet. If it gets capped, that's a reason to fold the turn unimproved. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 99 vs a mega fish
For someone who plays 85% of their hands, an aggression factor of .4 isn't horribly low. He could easily be raising top pair on the flop.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 99 vs a mega fish
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I play the same way as it was posted. [/ QUOTE ] You need to be more aggressive than OP. We need to try and fold overcards in the hands of CO. [/ QUOTE ] Yes. 3-bet puts 2 cold to CO. I also agree with posters who suggest call versus cap from fish is valuable information. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|