#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How are these stats?
the 6th-8th finishes are caused by being overly aggressive and loosing to a slightly better hand and not having enough chips to survive the latter rounds.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How are these stats?
It is hard to tell whether you are doing well or not with only 273 tourneys. If they had been all $30+3, your true ROI is 6% with a 95% confidence interval between -13% and 25%. It is simply too early to tell whether you are doing better than average or not. One thing is clear --- you are not doing spectacularly. I would do some study of your play.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How are these stats?
There is something off about your math here. If they were all $30, then 38 1st = 38*150 = 5700 32 2nds = 32*90 = 2880 16 3rds = 16*60 = 960 ---------- total win $ 9540 total cost (33*243)=8019 ------------ net win $ = 1521 ROI *1521/8019)= 18.9% You must have been doing significantly better at the lower buyins (or more wins) and worse at the $30s (or more places) to get this lower ROI. Since my own results are somewhat similar, I’ll guess that the two main things to help you are 1) tightening up and playing better ABC poker when in 5-8th place – playing better hands and folding when beat, and 2) improving your heads up and 3-handed play – getting a 2nd place to become a 1st is worth the same as getting an 8th to a 3rd, and much easier. --Greg |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How are these stats?
whoops, sorry, I entered a number wrong into my spreadsheet, your roi is 19% +-20.7%, so you could be quite good, and you are probably doing better than average.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How are these stats?
I would aggree that my play is not great, but at least I am not loosing money. I feel I can do a lot better but I lack the disapline of patience needed to finish in the money. I will work on my game to get this disaline. At least this is good for the UB bonus program. break even and you still make money.
Thanks Big O |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How are these stats?
Last night I calculated my SNG stats for the first time and was surprised to find out how high my ROI was on SNGs (especially compared to MTTs). I've been playing about 1 year, typically $5-20 single or two table.
Total Buy-ins + Fees = $1997 Total Winnings = $3054 Net Profit = $1057 ROI = 52.9% Is it time for me to move up and play $30 & $50, or is this too small of a sample? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How are these stats?
I think if you feel you are a winning player (it looks like you are) and you have enough of a bankroll then play the 30 and 50's. I do not think you need to worry much about playing the higher limits, just make sure you do not get broke because your bank roll was not large enough
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How are these stats?
I'm sure this has probably been talked about here before, but since I am fairly new - what is the typical bankroll / buy-in ratio for SNG players? (e.g. $1000 bankroll / $20 buy-in = 50-1 ratio).
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How are these stats?
30 is fine.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How are these stats?
Thanks for the reply Bradley. Do you think 20 or 25 don't leave enough room for variability?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|