![]() |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the mind is capable of far more than we usually give it credit for.
i think i could do the 10-15 games at once thing if i had the super-computer minority-report style. but, i don't. on my 17" monitor on my laptop i can play 6 tables at once but it's kind of hectic because of all the overlap and i don't do it very often. put 3 tables in 2 columns with a little space showing on each. i can fairly easily play 4 without too much difficulty, and a couple of those may be short-handed if i have found a special-fishyness situation. i might also add a $1 or $3 NL tourney in there as a 5th table where i don't have to think so much because i'm pretty much playing group 1-2 hands only except the blinds. sometimes i'll play a 10+1 SNG on party which will only lend to playing 2 other ring-games (maybe 1 of them short-handed) because the 10+1 requires a bit more concentration and will get down to 6 players or less fairly quickly. i admit that the multiple-limit scene isn't quite so exciting. but i am not averse to mixing in some SNG's....or the occasional multi...depending on my mood. i DO enjoy it btw...especially when i am winning. some people's brains are just wired to get enjoyment out of this type of thing.....most of my friends would rather kill themselves before playing poker on auto-pilot for hours on end. but i don't understand how people can sit in a casino and play a slot-machine for hours on end (although some might argue that poker-online is very similar....only with +ev). and some people don't understand how i can sit and enjoy a baseball doubleheader on tv (live or on tv) when it takes 5-6 hours to finish. lets face it....people are different. i cant and dont play some of those point-of-view type of shoot-the-enemy type of video-games on sony-playstation simply because they bore me. i enjoy poker....and multiple-table online-poker....and i enjoy making roughly the same amount of money as i do at my 'regular' job. and i can get this WITHOUT a 30+ minute commute each way.....i can watch the basketball game on TV or some Clint Eastwood movie re-run.....not have to deal with condescending/rude bosses...etc. allthewhile playing a game i enjoy. what's not to love?? i still get those spam e-mails where they say something long the lines of 'wouldnt you love to make extra money just sitting at home on your computer (or stuffing envelopes, or whatever)??' and i always thing 'ummmm, already do!!' George Koltanowski was able to play 10-20 blind-fold games of chess simultaneously....and he could do this well past 70-80 years of age (he passed away a couple years ago at 90 or so i believe). there have been other chess grandmasters who have been able to simultaneously play multiple games against top competition (blindfolded or not). i have some other stuff about some guys playing 4 blind-fold chess games and 2 bridge games at the same time....or 90 blindfold games of checkers/draughts simultaneously. i know this is only peripherally related but i someone may be as interested in that ridiculous trivia as i am. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, I've never tried playing fifteen tables, but considering I'll read forums while playing six or seven, where some of the tables are partially overlapping, and still browse the internet sometimes. I believe fifteen would be close to doable, if none of the tables overlapped.
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually my play isn't robotic. I do take in quite a few factors. The outcome of certain hands with some players and how they played it, does affect my future play against them.
And there's so much I based my decisions with, that it would take me forever to program a bot to do it, even if I knew how. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
it varies between 1-2 and 3-6 for most of them. Sometimes I'll play one of the tables as high as 20-40.
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe I am able to play a solid game on that many tables because of the practice I've had playing online. I started back when Planet Poker was the only game in town.
But I agree it is certainly not an optimal game at each table. I'll sometimes muck a hand I believe is slightly profitable if there's too much going on at the other tables. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i started with deltapoker [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have fun playing 6 tables at once but playing 9+ feels too much like work. If I'm playing less than 5 tables then I get bored and watch a movie or tv.
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Am I the only one that thinks this is a joke. 15 tables? Most sites let you play 3 tables at a time, some only 1. Where all are you playing? Party, Empire, Intertops, Paradise, Stars...ok it's possible, but that is alot of clutter. It is insane trying to find a new table when one dries up just playing 4 or 5 tables which is my norm. 15 is Hard to believe. But then if you do it and are successful...congrads. I'm jealous. I can't comfortably play 6 tables for more than an hour. 4 tables...maybe 5 I can play 4 hours before burn out which makes a nice 8 hours a day with an hour or two break. Also, I only play just short of full screen (Which leaves enough room to offset the tiles so no wrong buttons are hit). I tried increasing the resolution so 4 can fit on the screen, but squinting at all those tiny images is horrible on the eyes.
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
squinting at all those tiny images is horrible on the eyes. [/ QUOTE ] I've changed all the cards so that the number and suit take up the full card. Has anyone else made useful modifications to make viewing easier? Please describe. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i do not believe that playing 15 is possible without signifigant slowdown/timeouts/misplays. i could see 10 as being an upper limit for just about anyone while actually being able to slow all of the games down.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|