|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another riverdecision
[ QUOTE ]
TOP says that if you have a hand that is worth a call (or almost worth a call) when all the cards are out, you should bet in first position against a player who calls more than he bets. If he raises your bet I think you can fold since I don't see him raising with anything you beat. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, I know what top says. But what hands does he call with that we beat? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another riverdecision
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] TOP says that if you have a hand that is worth a call (or almost worth a call) when all the cards are out, you should bet in first position against a player who calls more than he bets. If he raises your bet I think you can fold since I don't see him raising with anything you beat. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, I know what top says. But what hands does he call with that we beat? [/ QUOTE ] A 4 or some random crap, and if you don't think he calls with anything you beat why do you even consider calling his bet? Do you think he's bluffing here often enough? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another riverdecision
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] TOP says that if you have a hand that is worth a call (or almost worth a call) when all the cards are out, you should bet in first position against a player who calls more than he bets. If he raises your bet I think you can fold since I don't see him raising with anything you beat. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, I know what top says. But what hands does he call with that we beat? [/ QUOTE ] A 4 or some random crap, and if you don't think he calls with anything you beat why do you even consider calling his bet? Do you think he's bluffing here often enough? [/ QUOTE ] I wasn't really. As I saw the river I knew I was gonna c/f. I just made a mistake in showing too much of the hand when I posted it [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|