hmm

[WillMagic]

I dunno guys. The read we are given is that villain is both a) decent and b) passive. I don't see how this adds up to going insane with AK. Given this read I find it really, really unlikely that villain will make a river bet into a protected pot without having us beat. We might be good 1-25 times if we are lucky.

Heads-up, I call. Against an unknown, I call. But this read combined with a protected pot lets us fold.

Will

[livinitup0]

[ QUOTE ]
I dunno guys. The read we are given is that villain is both a) decent and b) passive. I don't see how this adds up to going insane with AK. Given this read I find it really, really unlikely that villain will make a river bet into a protected pot without having us beat. We might be good 1-25 times if we are lucky.

Heads-up, I call. Against an unknown, I call. But this read combined with a protected pot lets us fold.

Will

[/ QUOTE ]

OK, Ive looked this over a few times, weighed the reads, the board, and any other info provided....after 10 minutes more....I still say weak sauce. 1 in 25 if we are lucky? How is that? Have we shown any aggression to prove otherwise or attempt to gather anymore information? The OP's experience at 6max makes this move seem....uncharacteristic.

Seriously if im off base here, please someone explain how?