Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-17-2005, 02:02 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: WPT Final 6

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Gigabet knows there's going to be a lot of bullying by the big stacks, with the blinds so high. He basically risked half his stack, to send the message that people who move in on him better have a hand, because he will call them down.

Although I'm sure he was hoping he'd have 2 live cards.

[/ QUOTE ]

yep - pretty much the same philosophy that Gus Hansen made popular during the first 2 seasons of the WPT.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey, you can't argue with success. haha.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-17-2005, 02:03 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: WPT Final 6

<b>Hand #62</b> - Patrik Antonius has the button in seat 2, Dicken raises to $300,000, Pedersen moves all in for $1.2 million from the small blind, and Dicken calls with Q-J. Pedersen shows Ah-Js, and he's in a dominating position to double up here.


The flop comes Ac-9c-9d, and Pedersen solidifies his lead with a pair of aces. Dicken needs something runner-runner to survive, but the turn card is the 3s, and he is drawing dead. (The meaningless river card is the 5s.) Rehne Pedersen doubles up to over $2.5 million in chips.

CHRIST GIGABET.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-17-2005, 02:06 AM
ononimo ononimo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 2
Default Re: WPT Final 6

[ QUOTE ]
<b>Hand #62</b> - Patrik Antonius has the button in seat 2, Dicken raises to $300,000, Pedersen moves all in for $1.2 million from the small blind, and Dicken calls with Q-J. Pedersen shows Ah-Js, and he's in a dominating position to double up here.


The flop comes Ac-9c-9d, and Pedersen solidifies his lead with a pair of aces. Dicken needs something runner-runner to survive, but the turn card is the 3s, and he is drawing dead. (The meaningless river card is the 5s.) Rehne Pedersen doubles up to over $2.5 million in chips.

CHRIST GIGABET.

[/ QUOTE ]

calling w/ dominated hands is not a successful long-term (or short-term) strategy.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-17-2005, 02:08 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: WPT Final 6

He finally has a hand....

Hand #65 - Doyle Brunson has the button in seat 6, and Dicken moves all in for about $800,000 from the small blind, winning the blinds and antes. Dicken shows pocket sevens as he collects the pot.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-17-2005, 02:11 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: WPT Final 6

[ QUOTE ]
calling w/ dominated hands is not a successful long-term (or short-term) strategy.

[/ QUOTE ]

Neither is folding everytime an aggressive player raises at a short-handed table with huge blinds.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-17-2005, 02:14 AM
ononimo ononimo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 2
Default Re: WPT Final 6

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
calling w/ dominated hands is not a successful long-term (or short-term) strategy.

[/ QUOTE ]

Neither is folding everytime an aggressive player raises at a short-handed table with huge blinds.

[/ QUOTE ]

we're not talking about just the QJ hand, sir.
like punker said, i like Gigabet as much as the next guy, but you can't tell me he isn't getting his money in badly A LOT.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-17-2005, 02:23 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: WPT Final 6

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
calling w/ dominated hands is not a successful long-term (or short-term) strategy.

[/ QUOTE ]

Neither is folding everytime an aggressive player raises at a short-handed table with huge blinds.

[/ QUOTE ]

we're not talking about just the QJ hand, sir.
like punker said, i like Gigabet as much as the next guy, but you can't tell me he isn't getting his money in badly A LOT.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I agree. Sorry if my post came off as mean. I was just trying to say I think it's hard to criticize final table play in a situation like this without being there to understand the thought process (I'm def. not saying you're doing that, though. Just sayin'...)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-17-2005, 02:44 AM
ononimo ononimo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 2
Default Re: WPT Final 6

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
calling w/ dominated hands is not a successful long-term (or short-term) strategy.

[/ QUOTE ]

Neither is folding everytime an aggressive player raises at a short-handed table with huge blinds.

[/ QUOTE ]

we're not talking about just the QJ hand, sir.
like punker said, i like Gigabet as much as the next guy, but you can't tell me he isn't getting his money in badly A LOT.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I agree. Sorry if my post came off as mean. I was just trying to say I think it's hard to criticize final table play in a situation like this without being there to understand the thought process (I'm def. not saying you're doing that, though. Just sayin'...)

[/ QUOTE ]

very fair point ... however, when you consider the size of the pot before the re-raise (about 600K) and the fact that he had to call another 900K more, it's not clear that calling with QJ was the right play in that situation.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.