#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ideal ratio of 1st : 2nd : 3rd finishes?
[ QUOTE ]
FWIW, I don't shut it down like a lot of people at the bubble. My ratio (only about 200 SNGs to date) is about 35:25:22:22. I'm not sure if I can keep that up over the long run. [/ QUOTE ] Are you saying that you get top 4 finishes 104% of the time? I Think that might be unsustainable, and it really isn't about your measley sample size. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ideal ratio of 1st : 2nd : 3rd finishes?
1st > 3rd > 2nd 1+2+3 minimum of 35%
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ideal ratio of 1st : 2nd : 3rd finishes?
I seem to be 3rd > 1st > 2nd so far. Am I just playing too passively ITM? I think I might be play "over"aggressive and pushing almost everything and calling almost every all in with a LARGE chip lead and high blinds. Standard? Probably also too tight 4 left where I'll fold hands like A8, KJ, etc if 4th is getting low stacked.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ideal ratio of 1st : 2nd : 3rd finishes?
[ QUOTE ]
I seem to be 3rd > 1st > 2nd so far. Am I just playing too passively ITM? I think I might be play "over"aggressive and pushing almost everything and calling almost every all in with a LARGE chip lead and high blinds. Standard? Probably also too tight 4 left where I'll fold hands like A8, KJ, etc if 4th is getting low stacked. [/ QUOTE ] it seems likely that you're trying to squeak ITM. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ideal ratio of 1st : 2nd : 3rd finishes?
Yeah, do you advocate just being a total bully with a lot of chips on the bubble? And pushing a lot of strong hands with 4 left if are currently in 3rd, but have a good shot to double up?
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ideal ratio of 1st : 2nd : 3rd finishes?
For a given ROI, the best distribution is one which produces the highest ITM.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ideal ratio of 1st : 2nd : 3rd finishes?
[ QUOTE ]
For a given ROI, the best distribution is one which produces the highest ITM. [/ QUOTE ] That would mean all thirds and zero firsts and seconds. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ideal ratio of 1st : 2nd : 3rd finishes?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] For a given ROI, the best distribution is one which produces the highest ITM. [/ QUOTE ] That would mean all thirds and zero firsts and seconds. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] yes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ideal ratio of 1st : 2nd : 3rd finishes?
[ QUOTE ]
For a given ROI, the best distribution is one which produces the highest ITM. [/ QUOTE ] Uh...no. That's only if you give a [censored] about variance. ROI is ROI. Who cares about ITM? [censored] ITM |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ideal ratio of 1st : 2nd : 3rd finishes?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] For a given ROI, the best distribution is one which produces the highest ITM. [/ QUOTE ] Uh...no. That's only if you give a [censored] about variance. ROI is ROI. Who cares about ITM? [censored] ITM [/ QUOTE ] I give a huge [censored] about variance! Low variance = high sanity. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|