#1
|
|||
|
|||
Top Two Against River Checkraise
Hero has KJo UTG
BB = $6. Hero limps, UTG+1 limp, Button limp, sb limp, BB check. Flop: K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] Pot: $30 Check to hero, hero bets $25, all fold to BB who calls. Turn: J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Pot: $80 BB checks, Hero bets $70, BB calls River: 7 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] Pot: $230 BB checks, Hero bets $125, BB raises to $300, hero ??? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
6-Handed
THis is 6 max
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top Two Against River Checkraise
Very read depending. I probably call. Looks much like something like 6 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] though...
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top Two Against River Checkraise
It was 6s4s.
Though I can't comprehend his call on the flop. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top Two Against River Checkraise
[ QUOTE ]
It was 6s4s. Though I can't comprehend his call on the flop. [/ QUOTE ] Really not? You didnt include stacksizes but suppose effective stacks are $600. Then I dont blame someone to call with a gutshot+BD flush on the flop for $25. I probably would call there as well in his shoes. Maybe not much EV+ but cannot be much EV- either if it is some implied odds working there. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top Two Against River Checkraise
I pay off becuase ppl make really really dumb bluffs at 6 max, and becuase they make really dumb checkraises when they hit 2 pair.
ex. I flopped a 9 high flush yesterday playing 400 6max, lead every street OOP and got raised on the river. I called, he had made 2 pair. They just dont get it. If you read thomas kellers recent article, they dont get hand values. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top Two Against River Checkraise
Well unless I hit top two, he has no implied odds. I would have shut down after the flop. In fact, I probably would have folded if I had K8 two pair or something.
And if I had a single pair, I just would have checked through. I guess I just didn't see it comming. I kept looking for how he could have hit a flush or OESD and didn't see it. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top Two Against River Checkraise
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It was 6s4s. Though I can't comprehend his call on the flop. [/ QUOTE ] Really not? You didnt include stacksizes but suppose effective stacks are $600. Then I dont blame someone to call with a gutshot+BD flush on the flop for $25. I probably would call there as well in his shoes. Maybe not much EV+ but cannot be much EV- either if it is some implied odds working there. [/ QUOTE ] this is a huge leak, and its not close. that is a horrible flop call. do the math. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top Two Against River Checkraise
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] It was 6s4s. Though I can't comprehend his call on the flop. [/ QUOTE ] Really not? You didnt include stacksizes but suppose effective stacks are $600. Then I dont blame someone to call with a gutshot+BD flush on the flop for $25. I probably would call there as well in his shoes. Maybe not much EV+ but cannot be much EV- either if it is some implied odds working there. [/ QUOTE ] this is a huge leak, and its not close. that is a horrible flop call. do the math. [/ QUOTE ] Excellent point. You simply can't call PSB's on the flop without much much deeper stacks if you have 5 effective outs on the flop. You might be able to raise as a semi-bluff on better boards but this isn't one of them. Bobbo: clean out your PMs your mailbox is full. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top Two Against River Checkraise
[ QUOTE ]
Bobbo: clean out your PMs your mailbox is full. [/ QUOTE ] Sorry, done now. ty for the heads up |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|