Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-08-2005, 08:46 AM
Martin Martin is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 20
Default Re: domesticating chimps. why not

Interesting since both Chimps and Gorillas are dying from Ebola, scientists figured it had to be coming from somewhere else.
I read that they thought the original source could be a rodent so I guess bats would be it. Any mention of how it's transmitted from the bats?
Flea bites would be my guess or maybe chimps eating bats.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-08-2005, 09:00 AM
Blarg Blarg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,519
Default Re: domesticating chimps. why not

Ebola can be transmitted through the air or through touching anything that has had a germ contact it, and through bodily fluids. With bats, as the natural host, there won't be massive amounts of bodily fluids leaking or blood droplets etc. being coughed into the air, but of course you can put many millions of germs on the head of a pin. I'm sure just handling an infected bat could get you, or breathing the air it breathes, or eating it. The article I read did say that the amount of virus in many bats was extremely low, so perhaps you could go breathing the air of an ebola infected bat for quite a while without getting infected. I guess it depends what organs and tissues it's stored in, etc., as to its chances of making its way out into the world.

They are trying to ban the eating of bats now, but partially just to encourage people to stay away from them and not handle them.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-08-2005, 11:10 AM
MrMon MrMon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 135
Default Re: domesticating chimps. why not

If it were simply a matter of aggression, you could breed that out of the chimps. The real problem with domesticating them is they breed too slowly. Take a look at all the animals that are domesticated. Almost all are quick to breeding age, all have young at least every other year. To domesticate, you need a large supply of animals from which to select, as you are literally creating a new species. (Elephants are the exception, but they aren't really domesticated, just trained.)

Once you have a large number of animals from which to select, the animal has to be genetically disposed to domestication, e.g. there has to be something that allows them to become docile. Even if you could get enough animals, sometimes the animal is just going to remain wild. Jared Diamond points out that ideally, Africans should have domesticated the zebra, but genetically, it's missing something found in the horse to allow it to domesticate. No doubt they tried, but ultimately failed, through no fault of their own.

So, great apes simply breed too slowly, plus, they're probably too smart to ever truly domesticate.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-2005, 11:57 AM
RunDownHouse RunDownHouse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 165
Default Re: domesticating chimps. why not

You should read some of the established great minds in anthropology that mostly say Diamond is a quack with poorly-supported theories.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-08-2005, 06:04 PM
Blarg Blarg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,519
Default Re: domesticating chimps. why not

[ QUOTE ]
You should read some of the established great minds in anthropology that mostly say Diamond is a quack with poorly-supported theories.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know who Jared is or much of anything about the field, but I understand it is one rife with politics and bitchy and sometimes earnest disagreement. Stephen Jay Gould for instance disagrees strongly with Richard Dawkins, and with a great many others too.

This really isn't all that rare in science.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-08-2005, 07:26 PM
Rduke55 Rduke55 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 15
Default Re: domesticating chimps. why not

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You should read some of the established great minds in anthropology that mostly say Diamond is a quack with poorly-supported theories.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know who Jared is or much of anything about the field, but I understand it is one rife with politics and bitchy and sometimes earnest disagreement. Stephen Jay Gould for instance disagrees strongly with Richard Dawkins, and with a great many others too.

This really isn't all that rare in science.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, antrhopology is a mess. It's like high school.
And many scientists have a bad impression of "popularizer" scientists.
I like a lot of Diamond's stuff. I thought Guns, Germs, and Steel was a great read.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.