|
|
|
|
#2
12-08-2005, 12:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 NL: Set of Ducks on a scary flop.
[ QUOTE ]
fold pre flop [/ QUOTE ] this is bad 
|
|
#4
12-08-2005, 12:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 5/10 NL: Set of Ducks on a scary flop.
[ QUOTE ]
you sure? [/ QUOTE ] 100%
|
|
#6
12-08-2005, 12:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 5/10 NL: Set of Ducks on a scary flop.
i think original poster would come out better in the end by folding to this pre flop raise...of course this depends on a few factors that neither your nor I know.
i don't think it's a "100% you got the odds man" call as it may seem to some.
|
|
#8
12-08-2005, 12:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 5/10 NL: Set of Ducks on a scary flop.
[ QUOTE ]
b/c his hand is pretty transparent with the limp-call? [/ QUOTE ] to me, yes; to villian, i'm not sure...if he can win pots without flopping sets vs the villian then obviously this is a call...but if that's the case he doesn't really need a hand anyways, right? [ QUOTE ] b/c 22 gets set over setted more often then others? [/ QUOTE ] Yeah...if he puts villian on a pocket pair with his preflop raise then that's definitely a factor to consider...also how far will villian go with a pair after the flop if he too doesn't flop a set. All points that need to be considered It really comes down to what is hero going to do the 7/8 times he doesn't flop a set? If he's playing the "no set no bet" type of poker then he is better off just folding in my opinion with 22... He's got to get a ton of action when does flop a set and his set has to be good...i think hero overestimated how much he may get when he flops a set...i think a lot of people do that with hands like 22, 33, and 44 Anyways just my thoughts...could be wrong. P.S. [ QUOTE ] are you from georgia? [/ QUOTE ] yes, sophomore at UGA
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
