#31
|
|||
|
|||
I\'ve done some mining as well and..
All I can say is I have a larger chunk of hands over a larger period of time and our numbers are more then a half a million off.
Mining these games is tricky. There is a lot of variance and you can get some real funky results over the short term especially on prima where he goes from 20k to 120k and then dumps it all but has only lost 20k. (which happens just about as much as him actually dumping that much) It's tough to ensure high quality. Even with serious control in the process, you'd still have difficultly not joining some of these in progress and skewing your data further. If you get enough hands then this becomes less of a problem.. So in essence just like a poster that posts his Pokertracker with 10k hands, GET MORE IF YOU WANT TO TALK! |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mahatmas playing 5/10 NL. WTF.
isn't $400nl a $400 buyin?
edit: just read the rest of the post. [ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mahatmas playing 5/10 NL. WTF.
He had a really rough and tilting week, like a REALLY bad tilting frustrated week, anyone who watched will have no doubt about this, but I think there's a good chance these stats are tweaked, 31 buyins at 20k over 8k hands? Ive seen him toss money around, but I dont know about that.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mahatmas playing 5/10 NL. WTF.
See my post. I've mined longer and I wouldn't even begin to call my data all that accurate but I can say for a fact that theres no way those numbers represent the whole picture or even close to it.
All it shows you is what kinds of swings he can go through especially if his A+ game isn't there and even A+ Mahatma will toss a lot of money around. Without some serious control as to how this mining goes AND a much much larger sampling those numbers are pretty much just useless. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mahatmas playing 5/10 NL. WTF.
[ QUOTE ]
i dont believe that he actually lost 31 buyins over 8K hands. i think the guy with 19 posts probably deleted any hands he won or something. that is completely insane. [/ QUOTE ] If you look at his other posts, he has made like 2-3 other posts 4 months ago about mahatma and his losing streaks. Seems likely that he is actually datamining these games for real. Why would he keep lying over a few months. I dunno, maybe, maybe not? Hopefully mr 19 posts can shed some light on this? Or maybe other people who datamine the game? |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mahatmas playing 5/10 NL. WTF.
Yes, I do datamine these games (Prima 50/100 and higher). The stats I posted are not tweaked, but they are probably not accurate either, because I don't datamine 24/7.
It would be nice if someone who has a greater sample size posted some stats. Regards, mr. 20 posts. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mahatmas playing 5/10 NL. WTF.
Another possiblity is that his computer has been hacked.
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mahatmas playing 5/10 NL. WTF.
[ QUOTE ]
Another possiblity is that his computer has been hacked. [/ QUOTE ] Post of the Month |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mahatmas playing 5/10 NL. WTF.
[ QUOTE ]
Another possiblity is that his computer has been hacked. [/ QUOTE ] Well that's is so blatantly obvious that no one really figured it needed to be said, most dodwnswings are actually hacking incidents. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mahatmas playing 5/10 NL. WTF.
He is back in the prima 100 200nl. Intresting line up, Hago which is shared account between Fuat Can and Dared, two good finnish players Hellraiser&Isokala and two others..
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|