OUR NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR VICTORY IN IRAQ

[ QUOTE ]
National Strategy for Victory in Iraq

Could someone post a link to the DNC strategy for Iraq?

[/ QUOTE ]


Shameful, adios, simply shameful. Two comments:

1) The last time you trotted out this canard, I pointed you to a link with a very sensible democratic strategy. You never responded.

2) The document to which you linked boils down to the following:

Our new strategy is to declare that our old strategy is working.

Bravo, Bushies, bravo. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

[adios]

[ QUOTE ]
Shameful, adios, simply shameful. Two comments

[/ QUOTE ]

Shameful for posting a link from the White House? What's shameful about that?

[ QUOTE ]
1) The last time you trotted out this canard, I pointed you to a link with a very sensible democratic strategy. You never responded.

[/ QUOTE ]

Please post the link again don't remember this post. Was this the DNC strategy or something?

[ QUOTE ]
2) The document to which you linked boils down to the following:

[/ QUOTE ]

Is this commentary as specific as the strategy that your link pointed to?

[canis582]

Theres nothing specific in the Bush 'strategy'

We have been paying Iraqi newspapers to print our propaganda. Way to foster democrazy!

[bobman0330]

[ QUOTE ]

Theres nothing specific in the Bush 'strategy'

[/ QUOTE ]

What about all the specific goals, the specific factual indications of how those strategies are working, and the specific acknowledgement of current and future challenges?

Linky

Oh, and btw, the "shameful" part is not posting a link from the White House. The shameful part is you posting "Democrats don't have a plan" two weeks after you posted the same thing and THEN failed to acknowledge that I did, in fact, show you a democratic plan.

I'll mark my calendar; it appears that you'll be making another "democrats have no plan" post around December 15.

[bobman0330]

[ QUOTE ]

Our new strategy is to declare that our old strategy is working.

[/ QUOTE ]

Am I missing something, or is this not supposed to be a "new strategy" but rather a vindication of the strategy that's currently being employed, and has been for some time?

[QuadsOverQuads]

[ QUOTE ]
2) The document to which you linked boils down to the following:

Our new strategy is to declare that our old strategy is working.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, it was either that or blame Bill Clinton. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]


q/q

[Stu Pidasso]

If we wish to succeed in Iraq we need to do the following with each Iraqi army battalion.

1. Tell every member of each Iraqi Army batallion that they may either leave the army right now or take an oath of loyalty to the new Iraqi government.
2. Let every member of that Iraqi batallion know that once they take that oath the punishment for desertion or cowardice in battle is death by firing squad. Let them know that in addition to death their home will also be razed.
3. Enforcment of the above is done exclusively by Iraqis.

Many will leave the Iraqi army but those that remain will be committed. New recruits will also be committed.

Stu

I fully expect to be flamed by all the pansie-ass lefties.

[Cyrus]

It's not about "victory", either.

[ QUOTE ]
Could someone post a link to the DNC strategy for Iraq?

[/ QUOTE ] You GOPsters keep treating this like a partisan issue, while it is a national issue. (See comments on post title.) Who said the DNC has a better "strategy"? Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. The question is whether or not the United States leadership has a good plan, there.

The proposals put forth by those who do not agree with the leadership's current "strategy" have been numerous, detailed and justified, and I have already provided web links to a number of 'em. (There are some documents that are not circulated on the web.) Case in point was Edward Luttwak's article in FA about disengaging now without losing sight of the objective. Et cetera.

For the record, I have found most of those proposals to be lucid and logical. On the other hand, every time I see Rumsfeld or Rice opening their mouths about Iraq, I cringe.

[BluffTHIS!]

[ QUOTE ]
Who said the DNC has a better "strategy"? Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Case in point was Edward Luttwak's article in FA about disengaging now without losing sight of the objective. Et cetera.
For the record, I have found most of those proposals to be lucid and logical. On the other hand, every time I see Rumsfeld or Rice opening their mouths about Iraq, I cringe.

[/ QUOTE ]

See that would be fine if the dumocrats actually adopted some of those alternatives as their plan. But they don't. They just want to keep saying NOT to the administration while never putting out such an alternative plan, even if it wouldn't work. That is why even if a sizeable portion of americans don't like certain administration policies, that they also don't place much faith in the dems who contantly criticize without offering an actual alternative.