Weak Flush

[wheelz]

he only put in one bet with the "4th" nuts in the J9s hand [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]



<font color="white">theoretically</font>

[wowacedude]

[ QUOTE ]

But seriously, I think when you have to pay 3bets for a SD here vs. a higher flush, isn't it better to just bet/call which also makes sure he doesn't check behind a set or 2pair.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is what was thinking too.

[sthief09]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
3-bet and check-raise a non-heart or check-call a heart river if he caps

[/ QUOTE ]

c/r a non-heart and fold to a 3bet?

[/ QUOTE ]


putting in a lot of bets with the 4th nuts and then folding for one more bet is not usually the best way to beat a lot

[/ QUOTE ]

Like with J9s? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
But seriously, I think when you have to pay 3bets for a SD here vs. a higher flush, isn't it better to just bet/call which also makes sure he doesn't check behind a set or 2pair.

[/ QUOTE ]


bet/call = 2 bets when behind, 1 when ahead
check/raise/call = 3 bets when behind, 2 bets when ahead

which is better?

i wouldnt expect him to cap the turn and check through the river


btw that shouldve read "is not the best way to beat a lag"

[naphand]

only in this case.