#1
|
|||
|
|||
2nd or 3rd strategy question
I have now played almost 200 50+5.
1st 27 2nd 32 3rd 16 In analyzing my own play, I believe that my 2nds exceed my wins because I often play for 2nd (situations where we have 2 small and 1 large stack - I work to get 2nd and do not worry as much about 1st. While I understand the value of 1st, I wonder about valuing the difference between 2nd and 3rd. Here I am exceeding "expected" by 8 2nds (one would probably assume randomly that 2nd and 3rd would be evenly distributed - or is that an error). Thus I have won $400 more - or $2/SNG. - ROI +4%. Am I likely sacrificing enough equity in often settling for 2nd? Of course I occasionally pull out 1st from the relatively short stack. So to summarize this rambling mess - with what stack sizes do you settle and go for 2nd rather than challenge the big stack and put 3rd into greater likelihood? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd or 3rd strategy question
You play g00t becase it better to get 2nd then 3rd.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd or 3rd strategy question
[ QUOTE ]
You play g00t becase it better to get 2nd then 3rd. [/ QUOTE ] you guys don't realize just how wise this response is.... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|